From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A3B158015 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 15:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53AF42BC05C; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 15:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ED8C2BC04F for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 15:54:11 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] global USE=gpg Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 16:54:03 +0100 Message-ID: <3547018.aeNJFYEL58@noumea> Organization: Gentoo Linux In-Reply-To: <2018286ec127ba4ec7e27960db67e3b49a3cc620.camel@gentoo.org> References: <2018286ec127ba4ec7e27960db67e3b49a3cc620.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3553283.44csPzL39Z"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3692b092-8466-4356-875d-efcb8b77113a X-Archives-Hash: 35b0e7bc20936f352cb53eb71f66f4d0 --nextPart3553283.44csPzL39Z Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] global USE=gpg Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 16:54:03 +0100 Message-ID: <3547018.aeNJFYEL58@noumea> Organization: Gentoo Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 > > we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg. > > Should we merge these to one global useflag? > >=20 > > Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags. > > See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634 > >=20 > > What are your ideas? > >=20 >=20 > We have also have a bunch of USE=3Dpgp and USE=3Dopenpgp, both of which a= re > more correct than USE=3Dgpg. Yeah, typical case of "formally correct thing being way more difficult to understand than colloquially practical thing" ... =2D-=20 Andreas K. H=FCttel dilfridge@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer=20 (council, comrel, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge --nextPart3553283.44csPzL39Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE/Rnm0xsZLuTcY+rT3CsWIV7VQSoFAmWQPRsACgkQ3CsWIV7V QSoyPxAAkQ/TfpQfjlZDqeQpj75mpVCxusjE7kDHfCqO8UUpQtnHBwVvC0vJp9fW 9ivuo9jpHSfvKlK1bVLnEQjjALPGhkYoE/xVfW7HJpGvedckP2oDC5nKREDWLQim 5+46EzjdBYCgdHR3gBn3PRY0BSLO0L9HbeLLFRkdBuv5b97Imfwef/aAer8DDURO CIpm2tx3yrz1p7S+nxJ7IZltO8m6v3yNI49sAArfwLP7hv9EJ+3aT/HoXl/VoFid GwzbARr9u92W/KNgChOkVujYGB4VrLa2K66/WsAABo8EwO8vveIH+bEfdCZiqWvs 3VmlsnW62i1i6PiwWVOYHVVKUhedSHMoZUSxDjcOIfmZD9H3/i/3QNkK+VGDzxSu 3VS+njPez+K5RW56gGICg7+zxFhoWaDpvEQMH+dUtmWcmAowx/UvzDyJLPKplmgY AHa/4ZBQecoqLSUTkR/vUN+4IN/lSaxXLjixAc0vMp7vAfq0vHH1QkN+gvWYzNam FLFIHPsubGv67eufgh6LVPrWfSJPVCfaa2sJ0nVShm6CfUQWMG5uFKB6mzJgT0dp 8z+jpXER9BnIBmWXqcWrUyJCDB6IB1CPpV/TeE2GNx4kzwHOUnIHRryoqfeL8ik9 VBf+UvV8M63mkbaQzAhiHWaq8sicR5rQriAWeTtghbdT7+yq/g0= =nRci -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3553283.44csPzL39Z--