From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC2F158451 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 13:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60B372BC12D; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 13:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00F1B2BC0C8 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 13:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <349e755931fc830af7026f8c61adaf69a580984f.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category: dev-debug From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2024 14:30:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wmslnuru.fsf@gentoo.org> References: <25e92c7126ffcc566c1cb1fb671de16d706ff4fa.camel@gentoo.org> <87wmslnuru.fsf@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zsBmWKYG+yTk3P2EJ7q9" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 59f475ce-6d73-467b-b460-99b195b0fe38 X-Archives-Hash: eb12d8b171560a6ed51c697ec01a4b58 --=-zsBmWKYG+yTk3P2EJ7q9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 13:20 +0000, Sam James wrote: > >=20 > > This was originally prompted by bug 920438 [1], pointing out that LLDB > > and GDB belong to the same category.=C2=A0 dev-util/ currently carries = 428 > > packages, so I suppose it makes sense to split it some more, especially > > when we can clearly distinguish some more specific groups. > >=20 >=20 > Does anything dominate dev-util post-move or is it a real mix? Nothing immediately stands out but there might be too many packages to see a pattern. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-zsBmWKYG+yTk3P2EJ7q9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmWap4kSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOdpoH/0jBBKHdimTFvLRssAkhQywIjcoFZ/LM JUwgUCvTl7fYyTk9cUt6OhoyinfTjLCd2g8JqnZUxDFIxRPhE9DfCXWZ/ZJLkZru AfBKImcnW+9J2o7nBw9TldWLm6eFlznAjExHTqLXnxNw+LX8QRdQLnBoDybyOe5O AQMGPEjFqdOLW/1T/y1TIY6lpTi1/YQydkUqOQQ7BUjXaELFSOiqPQ3UrLFGVaaE /dEGnxJfkNblJQFSPPE7+ft7frvjO/wKvT0tribVD7XORABNKLGLhS8SUmYpUvZr okxY/1MuMjy51NWOcA5jMdPyT1r6Xg+ZqdlIcLVUkJpT6vzOu37Zv14= =irdM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zsBmWKYG+yTk3P2EJ7q9--