From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C7E81382C5 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 929F9E086D; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437D9E082B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:27:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Agostino Sarubbo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: guru@gentoo.org, guru-devs@gentoo.org, =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:27:41 +0200 Message-ID: <3409582.LM0AJKV5NW@spectre> In-Reply-To: <896aa63a532178e6456fb101cfe8a1fb6003eaaf.camel@gentoo.org> References: <13171428.RDIVbhacDa@spectre> <896aa63a532178e6456fb101cfe8a1fb6003eaaf.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: f9463b1d-4432-484b-b1ce-93658b0e3040 X-Archives-Hash: 5024b613e32931d1bf8362eb874bf3d9 On gioved=C3=AC 22 aprile 2021 12:25:50 CEST Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with > > overlays. > >=20 > > Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to > > implement > > and test the CI > >=20 > > Atm it has been configured to work with master branch. > > I don't know how much is useful scan the dev branch since a first revis= ion > > has not yet been done. If you have opinions about, please let me know. > >=20 > > More info at: > > https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/ > >=20 > > The bugs will have an internal_ref as guru_ci. >=20