From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SaTYP-0005vd-CU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:14:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44B68E06B5; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rrzmta2.uni-regensburg.de (rrzmta2.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.155.52]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2D6E065E for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rrzmta2.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 380B88E71 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:12:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from grenadine.localnet (pc59050.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.102.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: hua59129) by rrzmta2.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 323DC8DD0 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:12:54 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:12:46 +0200 Message-ID: <3375796.AWLuLamy3m@grenadine> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.3.5-gentoo; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2091889.cipWPXjyTl"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Archives-Salt: bed5da1b-3ddd-450d-b0f4-15d8437fb450 X-Archives-Hash: bbc25208ab14b1ff30aaf120cc272760 --nextPart2091889.cipWPXjyTl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > "git cat-file -p $sha" is as close as you can get to commit objects > without needing to write your own decompressing wrapper. But it gives > the same results. Now, does the "signed data" also contain the parent sha? If yes, our discussion about rebasing is moot, because a rebase will in every case destroy previous signatures. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer kde, sci, arm, tex, printing --nextPart2091889.cipWPXjyTl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJPyNvuAAoJEEb+UGWnxTyHMasP/17LgpT6yq6iM82RFZM9K53R ckU5YnEqVDlbgfXvfoAuWh2x//wP7LUCNZly9b2ylT0xiuvRqG4Ro40X5fh84tiL LGukSskPa9L/CDen42csYd8TpqspxX+6k9ENjoaJATCBiSM8aYIKhB84Xnmg6zJI fP9X0668bEUEZejxkjhfP79YrOUGRPNYMzYiRq5KBm6sQPfiy4xIsiSKvfUItNQX B4vAG0Fxo0kTwg0oCHE22bHt1iWsAVoaljglY3wbrsiL+LGjCYXL4XnNmuay1awc sTVrGA7/aWqKfeKY5+FL4cvD6PxAHd+DP1ZwHkTsMdtPJyxBWWjQoT+nO4Vj6i+y pMIP2kCp5Ntqx92lMLxgq+/DOTGYCeYYDe2wUtX4vk3ulUsaQ8UYbxYAdih4jPBe FsmhDagMP46WgI/7OoQrbc2bYh4xKwaCGRt32J97qmxrOH3A/JJZbbyXateLqtGa uSpNBGRKTQm4mMkRp/NYAIHet4rU4iOp4nnyuW0EPkRT+6KBc31BZKTjUwbGmLXi /jNIbKXDZoP8/bQm3TZOumNQVbj8u16ypNBM1eE6x3jYoZxUp9W/F+PSxC4gzldO mbik/8wOMU4g0lxk6VZiJhXuFHcJ5nJgs1C/ZHhdNZxlUGdrV7oDm0WjnXbb2Nxm gHi8S5BAUJ54Ie4Bn9fZ =OCrW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2091889.cipWPXjyTl--