public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matthew Walker" <mwalker@kydance.net>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: gentoo.org reorg (GDN/GUN)]
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 17:40:01 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <33225.216.190.203.135.1032478801.squirrel@squirrelmail.kydance.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1032478566.325.1.camel@rattus.localdomain>

Another ditto here.

I see absolutely no reason to do this. ACL's on editting stuff, yes. On
reading it? No! Shouldn't even have to log in to use it at all. Having a
login for those who /wish/ to have one would be nice, and could maybe give
them some extra features. But the general information in the developers
section should be available to all. That is, afterall, the spirit of open
source.

Matthew

William Kenworthy said:
> I agree, this could be very counter productive.  By all means have some
> private commincation channels for core developers, but this looks too much
> closed source/microsoftish
>
> BillK
>
> On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 03:30, Steven Stillaway wrote:
>> >     * GDN would only be accessible to registered Developers (with
>> >       perhaps different access levels)
>>
>>
>> Putting ACL's on the developer content is completely counter
>> productive in an open source project IMHO.
>>
>> Why are you trying to make it more difficult for people who are
>> interested in hacking gentoo (and hopefully contributing back) to do so.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev





  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-19 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-19 17:03 [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: gentoo.org reorg (GDN/GUN)] Daniel Robbins
2002-09-19 18:32 ` Fred Van Andel
2002-09-19 19:04   ` [gentoo-dev] " Mark Gordon
2002-09-19 19:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven Stillaway
2002-09-19 20:07   ` Peter Ruskin
2002-09-19 23:36   ` William Kenworthy
2002-09-19 23:40     ` Matthew Walker [this message]
2002-09-19 22:06 ` Evan Read
2002-09-19 23:14   ` humpback
2002-09-20  8:42     ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-20  1:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mecho Puh
     [not found] <106232945@toto.iv>
2002-09-19 22:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeffrey D. Kowing
     [not found] <83821536@toto.iv>
2002-09-19 22:28 ` Jeffrey D. Kowing
2002-09-24 11:12   ` Thomas M. Beaudry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=33225.216.190.203.135.1032478801.squirrel@squirrelmail.kydance.net \
    --to=mwalker@kydance.net \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox