From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9978 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2004 06:07:43 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Sep 2004 06:07:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C5I5u-0004K0-2w for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 06:07:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 113 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2004 06:07:41 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 17726 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2004 06:07:40 +0000 Message-ID: <32863.10.0.0.51.1094710058.squirrel@10.0.0.51> In-Reply-To: <413FA8B7.8010108@gentoo.org> References: <33333.10.0.0.51.1094638559.squirrel@10.0.0.51> <413FA8B7.8010108@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:07:38 +0200 (CEST) From: "Klavs Klavsen" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at enableit.dk Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we want optimal performance? X-Archives-Salt: d9afb229-aa82-4336-b8c1-7abd2d0f9417 X-Archives-Hash: dbb87c85ce3df1d18e4a2eedf6096e1b Daniel Goller said: > although i am against overly tweaking CFLAGS, someone suggested > something that might be more sane to ask for: > > /etc/portage/packages.cflags > > an easy way to maintain your cflags you worked so hard for to obtain, > you can trade them in the forums or ebay and then append to your file, > not much work to implement in my eyes, and all the testing work is done > by those who want it > > this way those of you who want a per package set of CFLAGS get it w/o it > being an impossible task for gentoo to implement > > now you just need to get someone to make this happen or say "no, not > even that will happen" > > if the portage team picks it up, make sure to thank Magnade for the idea > [SNIP] hehe - I'll thank Magnade and whoever came up with the /usr/portage/packages.env idea - as I definetely think the packages.env is the winner - as it does cover every env. var you'd want to set - and not just CFLAGS. Flexibility wins again :) -- Regards, Klavs Klavsen, GSEC - kl@vsen.dk - http://www.vsen.dk PGP: 7E063C62/2873 188C 968E 600D D8F8 B8DA 3D3A 0B79 7E06 3C62 See our managed CMS Hosting Service at http://www.VirkPaaNettet.dk "Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." --Henry Spencer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list