From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from portablehole.net (lsanca1-ar15-112-168.elnk.dsl.gtei.net [4.41.112.168]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1B924C47 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:14:43 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 29007 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2001 00:25:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.portablehole.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Dec 2001 00:25:18 -0000 Received: from 63.204.249.45 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jano) by www.portablehole.net with HTTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 16:25:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <32770.63.204.249.45.1009758318.squirrel@www.portablehole.net> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 16:25:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] evolution From: "jano" To: In-Reply-To: <002401c19188$7c931bc0$0501010a@kgpro> References: <002401c19188$7c931bc0$0501010a@kgpro> X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.1.3 [cvs]) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 93bf903f-ba10-44ab-b2dc-53a00525038e X-Archives-Hash: 53e81f68386413e98e8f6757128141c9 Actually, sebastian gave you the complicated advice. Easier way would be to edit /etc/make.conf and remove ldap from the USE variable. Generally speaking, you don't want to uncomment stuff in package.mask unless you're willing to do some debugging :) > Thanks Sebastian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastian Werner" > To: > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:16 PM > Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] evolution > > >> Yes It is. I don't know why. But my evolution works fine with >> openldap-2. Try to unmask it in profiles/package.mask. >> >> Before not know why it is disabled, You should re-activate the flag >> after emerge evolution. >> >> Sebastian Werner >> >> Am Mon, 2001-12-31 um 00.11 schrieb Kevin Gordon: >> > Hi everyone, >> > I tried "emerge net-mail/evolution" and received error "need >> > OpenLDAP version >= 2" . Tried "emerge net-nds/openldap" received >> > version 1.? Is > the >> > openldap version 2 not available (masked)? >> > Cheers, >> > Kevin. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > gentoo-dev mailing list >> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org >> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gentoo-dev mailing list >> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org >> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev