On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
<hkBst@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug
>> #258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see
>> http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project
>> (and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under
>> GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as
>> another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case,
>> should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be
>> "templatized" like most licenses ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mounir
>>
>
> That paste is gone/expired.
>
> Marijn
>
> - --
> Sarcasm puts the iron in irony, cynicism the steel.
>
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
> <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmixHYACgkQp/VmCx0OL2wURgCff8WSLE9PHXfO/HI+GdrE1W3J
> 0/kAoLpB4oFEwOx5Dk+ceo70vCueZgbk
> =hKRC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

I attached it to this email.


Mounir