From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.200])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j48KSsaR019589
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 8 May 2005 20:28:55 GMT
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so1592729nzn
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 08 May 2005 13:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=n8etla6rZMjSSswJPUfEUjX2CLoLMT2222BBZE7dXFev9YzkPyBFf5WXl6Cun4borNWRunmTVR+Grp5YDJddrxXhS7Ivu1Ga4RlTgLwNLAZySvmXU2FZ/oNRppg4G0NdvgGS9rIYrlPo31P9ODkc2RzpTedRBqsq5sAHsHwtf6I=
Received: by 10.36.146.14 with SMTP id t14mr830674nzd;
Sun, 08 May 2005 13:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.59.20 with HTTP; Sun, 8 May 2005 13:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <31a24e290505081329428b3ed4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 22:29:04 +0200
From: Matthijs van der Vleuten <zr40.nl@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.4 still ~x86
In-Reply-To: <200505082024.27187.luke-jr@utopios.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200505081116.32128.lostson@lostsonsvault.org>
<200505090130.35339.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
<200505082024.27187.luke-jr@utopios.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j48KSsaR019589
Subject: [gentoo-dev]
X-Archives-Salt: dec5bdf4-aad5-40b0-8dc2-50970f921b79
X-Archives-Hash: c96e055c52c29cc17d506ef88226a65b
On 5/8/05, Luke-Jr <luke-jr@utopios.org> wrote:
> On Sunday 08 May 2005 16:30, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > The only issue I heard about was problems with gcc3.4's -fvisibility stuff.
>
> Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo
> adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable, seeing as
> it's not a bug in KDE...
Short version: It's the ebuild that's unstable, not KDE itself.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list