From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SHhB7-0002yQ-4X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:56:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82351E0C33; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044C3E0AF3 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from devil (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ago) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B8B41B4007 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:55:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Agostino Sarubbo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:55:26 +0200 Message-ID: <3149143.BNeT1TtcNv@devil> X-Face: #*|hh`@)0<_$@}8af"ATwhD,GhO^.'CXRXWy'Grh7rm3<,W9_F\]oInl%mw:6,@_#bZfa` y`eIz@tqEzKpXu44S>-^+pnNARoezQnI>\38'8cL45U&.\L@qb=a#ap5#@-}8CHY-W.YOQ fn]fzF*=VZOIMT|Y@}c`H\0p@F0q9J@Xb_rmw$J\{gkx-;hRGly'"3KD1\!$6H|$Gs%UGH ;t_VF0|.8dpUJs:;,[\S5<8%`0)YN:Bd References: <201204101535.40321.vapier@gentoo.org> <29004602.E3mRPZ5On9@devil> <201204101551.34228.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5447966.I0cAvHgeM1"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Archives-Salt: 5e0c9a68-02c8-4c2a-9d34-f4b26b520756 X-Archives-Hash: af1ce3b099d07adf318a1df7458adaa5 --nextPart5447966.I0cAvHgeM1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:51:33 Mike Frysinger wrote: > not really sure what you're referring to here. that bug is already fixed > in latest glibc-2.14 ebuild. I mean, no need to open a new bug, just continue in that security bug, because the fixed version has never had stable keyword. -- Agostino Sarubbo ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D --nextPart5447966.I0cAvHgeM1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABCgAGBQJPhJAvAAoJEOTDgjZ80txdD/IH/RHkabJAzoOyVGVTCamGG915 AZ/DRIX6DglOR8vdWzOs0t2waIRVHHCk63LCnPv05ViyeGzuY4tI4kRA+TcCJ93s TRHjJAjs4VmmH9lrzkWZVBniRz82NPciP1WyoEhRYZpkLO13YaqWRdiEAKyZmSNK 3UN4MG3vEnlgpMFVn1javSvqnzo2nDV3JSo99x9ru7gGVB/9787hqHp7zc/Xllg3 Za6hmZeaX2Qbb6qB2UXIfnbSlkfmtzTZFtsgGWnBSmHSaftgSrNFzRaQoz6F8e95 rR36bf0zQDGKaXF18eLy74MZQRdoe/xbOssQRqPrGSfx923CqaD14PjApxJdo1g= =drrn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5447966.I0cAvHgeM1--