From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-81597-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2984B139694
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:41:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E87391FC113;
	Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:41:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mo6-p04-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p04-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5304::4])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E62AE0EA5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:41:05 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1501335664;
	l=337; s=domk; d=akhuettel.de;
	h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:
	In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:From;
	bh=31EP66KgIFnlHFrpv3Bbq62VwkGnV/oHwULc3qTpARE=;
	b=uMt2U6YfkHwqPQ2JXi7Vl1jw3/w8bwmPojZMyP6UuZOnmqeGT11wn/FI7e3AtjtKeu
	0UHiveKYaI5cBY+Xw6WUlf3gU9SNq7FkTXEHjuDkNtGi4c2RD/ycavPIWEoyJyytaPrg
	EOuqPDdLyQdeRxIIKTr8q564e1zCM/3bF0/x4=
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo04
X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcy7/4i/LfK0HEnQHvj8Yvw=
Received: from porto.localnet ([118.70.183.132])
	by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 41.1 SBL|AUTH)
	with ESMTPSA id c0565dt6TDf39mM
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:41:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:41:01 +0200
Message-ID: <31287322.sszGj55mlL@porto>
Organization: Gentoo Linux
In-Reply-To: <597BA8BA.1010003@adelielinux.org>
References: <20170724222223.6d359e47@sf> <assp.0382565697.20170728161042.22082063@o-sinc.com> <597BA8BA.1010003@adelielinux.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Archives-Salt: ff08e102-c125-4cf1-a866-8b2228cc1933
X-Archives-Hash: fe32a81f9935ee4f7fa69ec8c6591cb5

Am Freitag, 28. Juli 2017, 23:12:26 CEST schrieb A. Wilcox:
>=20
> At least I have a good reason to unsubscribe now.
>=20
>=20
> Farewell,
> --arw
>=20

Please don't take William as a typical Gentoo developer. He isn't.

=2D-=20
Andreas K. H=FCttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)