From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 488F313832E for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 17:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E3C921C038; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 17:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C34E080A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 17:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eris.local (dynamic-adsl-84-221-251-48.clienti.tiscali.it [84.221.251.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BF3D34058A; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 17:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: LLVM To: =?UTF-8?Q?C_Bergstr=c3=b6m?= , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20160816182204.61c27681.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20160819020737.5419083.98443.119986@pathscale.com> Cc: llvm@gentoo.org From: Luca Barbato Message-ID: <3053280c-5a7c-0651-c954-5efb871dc4cc@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:34:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: ce1b973c-d2d6-42a9-8f5c-a7b8ce6cb2f8 X-Archives-Hash: b66135f4f11efbf11886281500c72593 On 19/08/16 19:13, C Bergström wrote: > I finally got it to build and here's the size numbers > 952K ./lib/libc++abi.a > 616K ./lib/libc++abi.so.1.0 > > If the above isn't enough motivation and you really want benchmarks > which prove it's a pig... I'll try to figure something else > > Not exactly a 1:1 comparison because I think other things are mixed in, but... > 352K /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9/libsupc++.a > 356K /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/libsupc++.a > > In the land of HPC we frequently statically link stuff... not that > 864KB is big by any sort of modern definition, but it does raise > questions.. > We aren't in love with any specific implementation of it so it is nice to have some comparison. We could probably start a page in the wiki about it. As said, the only part that makes uncomfortable about libcxxrt seems the lack of versions and releases. Surely we can cut another snapshot out of it and be happy about it. lu