From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B428139694 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B46E71FC0BC; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 654481FC076 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.100.0.22] (host-37-191-226-104.lynet.no [37.191.226.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: k_f) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54E193416FB; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Michael Palimaka References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> <2caadc57-87da-67fd-6824-8fbeb3e1ddc9@gentoo.org> From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Message-ID: <2fe1858c-ed53-e97c-a967-4e92888ad579@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:05:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2caadc57-87da-67fd-6824-8fbeb3e1ddc9@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j77m3qwwNa0lqoBigh6IlNiGoCTe7lqFA" X-Archives-Salt: 3797a583-e24f-49db-b99b-28cdd0df949a X-Archives-Hash: d7a7f25cabe9dea801305ab07bbac9de This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --j77m3qwwNa0lqoBigh6IlNiGoCTe7lqFA Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="BFc7duNTMKrUUlcPbfMkw7Xt0gfp7NoFa"; protected-headers="v1" From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Reply-To: k_f@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Michael Palimaka Message-ID: <2fe1858c-ed53-e97c-a967-4e92888ad579@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> <2caadc57-87da-67fd-6824-8fbeb3e1ddc9@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <2caadc57-87da-67fd-6824-8fbeb3e1ddc9@gentoo.org> --BFc7duNTMKrUUlcPbfMkw7Xt0gfp7NoFa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/25/2017 02:28 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > Does a bug # really need to always be in the summary line? It can eat > valuable characters and tags which are pretty popular are equally valid= IMO. I would prefer the summary to be informative without having bug ID at all. Summary should describe the change ,not only "fixes XXX", the bug reference belongs in body (tags) --=20 Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 --BFc7duNTMKrUUlcPbfMkw7Xt0gfp7NoFa-- --j77m3qwwNa0lqoBigh6IlNiGoCTe7lqFA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEtOrRIMf4mkrqRycHJQt6/tY3nYUFAll4y+sACgkQJQt6/tY3 nYXEfwf/UQlYJhie6b6RtVyVVKs08IICiuyaP5X2tVtMGsFMy4JKN5yjzOz/ohVf cizBPqkCq0ZLPk7PGTdIPMpd1qwGyVS4p25VZtxf11uLcLvMxExAIgWtBtxfQNPZ Svmy1WYpfmMfUoOI9QCOh1J5/IrcqwQVUotM7jXiGir0DO3rakqhaMnF4wp4H/uo xYgDm4/xjhLmU8FLVJqQG4dwFzqNUKJS6GTW2uimfQ/hQifClBVynVFsz/ntW5nh YVvtqSG8orkN5ujaRFshmRqIiO1yIBAdhMSeoeMssCXjIQkxqRj6qgRSohjzlMHC IoHUfNtkV8+WcFYlW6/HjHJcSPlMig== =ZfL0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --j77m3qwwNa0lqoBigh6IlNiGoCTe7lqFA--