From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ntow9-0006f4-Ql for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:13:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D64CE076D; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pv0-f181.google.com (mail-pv0-f181.google.com [74.125.83.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08CEE075E for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvg16 with SMTP id 16so2779995pvg.40 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:12:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=H/Uz/oKmCwkBBnqZAsXLghZFzOXGh0oct64iAvjPyIM=; b=fU1DdTgr8q/EovPouUzUzgAgG3yFFU3tcova4HMVOU3R+/wI14pptOMfg7BajVNo2M Oeesk7BugdeAobXY1ZALrEFYj4lfWk5tQsi3sv7Q37On5gT509dV4oJrLMFjsNoaMsrC Iss0v3YRTLiR/pwh1IDhJNmZ5Xfvd6YqxVJHQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mcwPGK/+busTH5o1MWNne4N+zgfjgzsYtaR5H4On/GT3uKErtYFGQoHh0lAn9iU4x4 JxBIiyaYvkY1gzUAC/0q0m0mF7anqYR6HCYcwd8dt/9ToZAXM/DiuuuyFvxd2XrmHd+E 7RuPdajbXA7/cXYocFYTlD5TuW4AlMwG8SGAg= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.1.19 with SMTP id 19mr2240369wfa.111.1269292374381; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:12:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201003201511.49740.Arfrever@gentoo.org> References: <4BA27CE2.7080005@gentoo.org> <4BA34E5C.7040800@gmail.com> <201003201511.49740.Arfrever@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:12:54 -0400 Message-ID: <2e0007041003221412i7a3f283an264d750a4e343fde@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages pulling in python-3*, also they dont require it From: Jacob Godserv To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e90f68bb-779f-4348-b927-c5300d80e29a X-Archives-Hash: 0abdb4c7627f208a8c4830dc6aa96093 On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisa=C5=82(a): >> So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news >> item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and sugge= st >> that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with a >> link to documentation with specific instructions and a bit more detail o= n >> why they might wish to mask it and under what circumstances they might n= ot. >> >> I'd suggest an unmasking date 30 days after the release of the news item= . > > Python 3 is not masked. The discussion is about stabilization. Duncan's comments still apply, though, right? What's against writing a news item about stabilizing Python? --=20 Jacob "For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now =E2=80=94 and never to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened." Are you ready?