From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39979-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NpaaL-0001B3-3g
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:05:25 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 570B4E0AD9;
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:05:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pv0-f181.google.com (mail-pv0-f181.google.com [74.125.83.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE361E08F4
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:04:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pvc30 with SMTP id 30so2394584pvc.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:04:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=JWty/G77f3SqkJCTipWI+L34rkvT16RJ5Zsp951ZGPg=;
b=tJzSAWwr4ZaNN9gapuy0zT/UlQjtXb0NKYrwJDlQQEKeFwv5QQEwCq8Db4Wim/xtea
IQCAVaVd4vy/em3lBCbny0PcYCTw9mYqunbAfbo3auPZQvWb6L761IKpCJfZzid+o355
HLR8DlF7TUNnuEz3v3BAQi50AVF962+jmOXsA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=HLQwuI3pFxKkRNHNeb5os2f8FFaq0BDX0cN92PCPEr0qMti2wvGv1JY4h1k4fAUnKt
4po1sJ/PsCZnMcC5y0guBekvu814SuRksMf2SalKAN/KORoO3d9vUAvUM8/y4G4L2dR9
DnO62wLt0zEaRnr2S5f+cE/iLKxd4W5e2wUpY=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.128.1 with SMTP id f1mr1104528wfn.198.1268283896373; Wed,
10 Mar 2010 21:04:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20100311023427.GA19680@linux1>
References: <201003041923.17749.Arfrever@gentoo.org>
<4B919F98.2090208@gentoo.org> <20100308212816.GA1309@linux1>
<201003101837.02887.Arfrever@gentoo.org>
<e117dbb91003101443o236ea93bv9c13afae8e8064e8@mail.gmail.com>
<20100311002514.GA19387@linux1>
<e117dbb91003101724scb19d67pde98255894040515@mail.gmail.com>
<20100311023427.GA19680@linux1>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:04:56 -0500
Message-ID: <2e0007041003102104y67c74e4aud6bef3eff1a4b976@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item
From: Jacob Godserv <jacobgodserv@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: bc879476-a844-46c5-8bbf-7ab6158803fd
X-Archives-Hash: e2c938ee8f86790714f591202fa436f4
The problem here, I think, is everyone has their opinion about what it
means for something to go stable, and I haven't seen more than one or
two references to what has been predetermined as policy for
stabilization. I think we should do a little less debating over
personal opinions (which is a "hot" topic, apparently) and more about
how Gentoo guidelines determine what can go stable. If the guidelines
don't cover this, then they ought to be fixed.
--=20
Jacob
"For then there will be great distress, unequaled
from the beginning of the world until now =97 and never
to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut
short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the
elect those days will be shortened."
Are you ready?