From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NpaaL-0001B3-3g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:05:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 570B4E0AD9; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pv0-f181.google.com (mail-pv0-f181.google.com [74.125.83.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE361E08F4 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvc30 with SMTP id 30so2394584pvc.40 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:04:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JWty/G77f3SqkJCTipWI+L34rkvT16RJ5Zsp951ZGPg=; b=tJzSAWwr4ZaNN9gapuy0zT/UlQjtXb0NKYrwJDlQQEKeFwv5QQEwCq8Db4Wim/xtea IQCAVaVd4vy/em3lBCbny0PcYCTw9mYqunbAfbo3auPZQvWb6L761IKpCJfZzid+o355 HLR8DlF7TUNnuEz3v3BAQi50AVF962+jmOXsA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HLQwuI3pFxKkRNHNeb5os2f8FFaq0BDX0cN92PCPEr0qMti2wvGv1JY4h1k4fAUnKt 4po1sJ/PsCZnMcC5y0guBekvu814SuRksMf2SalKAN/KORoO3d9vUAvUM8/y4G4L2dR9 DnO62wLt0zEaRnr2S5f+cE/iLKxd4W5e2wUpY= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.128.1 with SMTP id f1mr1104528wfn.198.1268283896373; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:04:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100311023427.GA19680@linux1> References: <201003041923.17749.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <4B919F98.2090208@gentoo.org> <20100308212816.GA1309@linux1> <201003101837.02887.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20100311002514.GA19387@linux1> <20100311023427.GA19680@linux1> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:04:56 -0500 Message-ID: <2e0007041003102104y67c74e4aud6bef3eff1a4b976@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item From: Jacob Godserv To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: bc879476-a844-46c5-8bbf-7ab6158803fd X-Archives-Hash: e2c938ee8f86790714f591202fa436f4 The problem here, I think, is everyone has their opinion about what it means for something to go stable, and I haven't seen more than one or two references to what has been predetermined as policy for stabilization. I think we should do a little less debating over personal opinions (which is a "hot" topic, apparently) and more about how Gentoo guidelines determine what can go stable. If the guidelines don't cover this, then they ought to be fixed. --=20 Jacob "For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now =97 and never to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened." Are you ready?