From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-86233-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC1D4138334
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD47EE0930;
	Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712C5E08EF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4540E3DBD6;
	Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.40.204.68] (ovpn-204-68.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.68])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3F5F105704F;
	Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to
 0.0.4
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>
References: <a54d4c30708178dc9929970ab7b41245cd727313.1540481477.git.mprivozn@redhat.com>
 <d5b3ddfc-9e64-13ec-0793-d6c72cf90fa5@gentoo.org> <8736sta57j.fsf@gentoo.org>
 <2c255ffe-d68e-f970-b390-c182dd6c6490@gentoo.org>
 <ef43dc28-ea0c-ba74-85a9-237ff808dbd6@redhat.com>
 <fb2f5e53-181c-3780-8e24-882cd30f1017@gentoo.org>
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFsIFByw612b3puw61r?= <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <2c0e94db-bfde-a8ee-2eb5-26027fa9a56c@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:16:26 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fb2f5e53-181c-3780-8e24-882cd30f1017@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Archives-Salt: 818959cb-3b5c-4c69-ac7b-8be9df48b12c
X-Archives-Hash: 8ce9d2d4cd05b2d9edb054cabad653de

On 10/26/2018 05:42 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/26/2018 04:40 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
>>
>> So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather
>> unfortunate. 
> 
> In this case there's no "project" associated with libvirt-snmp; but if
> there were, it would have a <project-name>@gentoo.org alias that you
> could send patches to. 

Well, why don't we create something like virtualization@gentoo.org? That
would be a mailing list to discuss virtualization related topics.

Bugzilla is still the official (and in this case,
> best) place to put these in my opinion.

I don't think so. I've been attaching patches to BZ in the past and the
response time was very poor. I know everybody is working on gentoo in
their spare time and I appreciate it, but why not use something that
works for both sides? I think that if we want to attract more volunteers
we have to have a process that goes the least into their way.

> 
> Personally I don't mind them on the -dev list, but they do get sent to a
> thousand people who have no interest in or ability to commit them.
> 

That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of
subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access.

But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches
until there's an agreement on how to do that.

Michal