From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-86233-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC1D4138334 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD47EE0930; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712C5E08EF for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4540E3DBD6; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.40.204.68] (ovpn-204-68.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.68]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3F5F105704F; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> References: <a54d4c30708178dc9929970ab7b41245cd727313.1540481477.git.mprivozn@redhat.com> <d5b3ddfc-9e64-13ec-0793-d6c72cf90fa5@gentoo.org> <8736sta57j.fsf@gentoo.org> <2c255ffe-d68e-f970-b390-c182dd6c6490@gentoo.org> <ef43dc28-ea0c-ba74-85a9-237ff808dbd6@redhat.com> <fb2f5e53-181c-3780-8e24-882cd30f1017@gentoo.org> From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFsIFByw612b3puw61r?= <mprivozn@redhat.com> Message-ID: <2c0e94db-bfde-a8ee-2eb5-26027fa9a56c@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:16:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <fb2f5e53-181c-3780-8e24-882cd30f1017@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:16:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Archives-Salt: 818959cb-3b5c-4c69-ac7b-8be9df48b12c X-Archives-Hash: 8ce9d2d4cd05b2d9edb054cabad653de On 10/26/2018 05:42 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 10/26/2018 04:40 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote: >> >> So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather >> unfortunate. > > In this case there's no "project" associated with libvirt-snmp; but if > there were, it would have a <project-name>@gentoo.org alias that you > could send patches to. Well, why don't we create something like virtualization@gentoo.org? That would be a mailing list to discuss virtualization related topics. Bugzilla is still the official (and in this case, > best) place to put these in my opinion. I don't think so. I've been attaching patches to BZ in the past and the response time was very poor. I know everybody is working on gentoo in their spare time and I appreciate it, but why not use something that works for both sides? I think that if we want to attract more volunteers we have to have a process that goes the least into their way. > > Personally I don't mind them on the -dev list, but they do get sent to a > thousand people who have no interest in or ability to commit them. > That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access. But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches until there's an agreement on how to do that. Michal