From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Optimize crate unpacking
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 16:02:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b970ab19a96daff31a34b5a1f9f468349bd362a.camel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f35584f5-7c0a-4466-b8f7-f76a345178fb@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1211 bytes --]
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 16:00 +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 12/05/2024 20.21, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 19:22 +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> > > On 12/05/2024 04.26, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > + if [[ ${PKGBUMPING} != ${PVR} ]]; then
> > > > + pushd "${DISTDIR}" >/dev/null || die
> > > > +
> > > > + ebegin "Unpacking crates"
> > > > + printf '%s\0' "${crates[@]}" |
> > > > + xargs -0 -P "$(makeopts_jobs)" -n 1 -- \
> > >
> > > Consider using get_makeopts_jobs instead of makeopts_jobs, as it
> > > searches more variables for --jobs.
> >
> > Whose bright idea was to add a second similarly named function that does
> > roughly the same thing but apparently differently? It can hardly get
> > more confusing.
>
> You are absolutely right, it sucks that we have two very similar methods.
>
> You are invited to suggest how the situation can be improved. However,
> rambling without presenting alternatives is not helpful in any way.
>
My suggestion would be for the person who introduced new methods
and implicitly claimed the old methods to be "legacy" to put an actual
effort to migrate consumers.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 512 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-13 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-12 2:26 [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cargo.eclass: Optimize crate unpacking Michał Górny
2024-05-12 2:44 ` Sam James
2024-05-12 17:22 ` Florian Schmaus
2024-05-12 18:21 ` Michał Górny
2024-05-13 14:00 ` Florian Schmaus
2024-05-13 14:02 ` Michał Górny [this message]
2024-05-16 6:55 ` [gentoo-dev] Obtaining values for --jobs and --load-average Florian Schmaus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b970ab19a96daff31a34b5a1f9f468349bd362a.camel@gentoo.org \
--to=mgorny@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox