From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4D1138359 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6D4CE09C8; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84311E099B for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] optfeature.eclass: New eclass with definition from eutils To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20200906154731.162917-1-soap@gentoo.org> From: Joonas Niilola Message-ID: <2b7a19f1-a209-2681-9ae8-27ec6ecbc572@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 18:51:39 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200906154731.162917-1-soap@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QBGs5pIJk48vKzCvtb8qCJidg4sWAthrJ" X-Archives-Salt: e3689351-261b-48b3-9fab-5e705402b39f X-Archives-Hash: 63f7c23709125d36a96879b902953dd6 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --QBGs5pIJk48vKzCvtb8qCJidg4sWAthrJ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="2bj4VkaRHGEPNlrVjJyDKdFPUXkNfdP3k" --2bj4VkaRHGEPNlrVjJyDKdFPUXkNfdP3k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US On 9/6/20 6:47 PM, David Seifert wrote: > --- > eclass/optfeature.eclass | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 eclass/optfeature.eclass > Can we have the "why" answered? Wasn't this supposed to be part of future EAPI? -- juippis --2bj4VkaRHGEPNlrVjJyDKdFPUXkNfdP3k-- --QBGs5pIJk48vKzCvtb8qCJidg4sWAthrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGnBAEBCgCRFiEEltRJ9L6XRmDQCngHc4OUK43AaWIFAl9VBY9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDk2 RDQ0OUY0QkU5NzQ2NjBEMDBBNzgwNzczODM5NDJCOERDMDY5NjITHGp1aXBwaXNA Z2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBzg5QrjcBpYs9fB/41jm8E0uw3DFkyk1t92GB2lf9yq9fu x0BAazvRVgj+Cl+0pa4T+UvAcmMeV4U+7vOD7Mb3/rwVGxG3qhu/+bFBbIPfI7ur uqbGoPDn0VELyKB+GaN34mxlOV49h+sVexYXagD2jcm1wjO0Z20n3xyfDdKXxYFS DX/tGsxHz6KMMiUMkuIi4KW94MGdQRsxHkIVcN8yvWHnMSC4OlDEC+frKDAwTYBy ZnQbuYJJl3iA14/GBpuznpaQEMMcGKGgcE2XZS8M3tb0TfZQ1K4KzYkmLXu6qmAB aS3Ioy+bdoox6+y+96NDdLfH1bMJ3/o8YxbWYFVjp1JyQjK0IKAuXakX =YL2N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QBGs5pIJk48vKzCvtb8qCJidg4sWAthrJ--