From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RbVrn-00033T-TQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:22:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B593C21C261; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30F521C1E8 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from devil (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ago) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07D5D1B40B1 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:21:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Agostino Sarubbo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:21:33 +0100 Message-ID: <2952499.vjcSCuKqgc@devil> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo ; KDE/4.7.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4EEB2715.5060806@gentoo.org> References: <4ECA0EA3.8020407@gentoo.org> <1769026.9R6ACMvGeL@devil> <4EEB2715.5060806@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2700255.gOERULAnZp"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Archives-Salt: f5e8f9ab-4ead-4a97-838a-ab2a247cbce0 X-Archives-Hash: c41d1a933ef592aff1bc995c8bdfab9d --nextPart2700255.gOERULAnZp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Friday 16 December 2011 06:10:13 Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Does your script do any checking on the quality of the ebuild, eg that > it respects C/LDFLAGS. If so, that's useful and would help package > maintainers to better prepare their ebuilds for stabilization. Unfortunately no. For LDFLAGS there is a QA warning and is enough visible For CFLAGS I see with the naked eye a bit of build log My script at "end of work" just runs repoman full and cat entire ebuild( so, imho, should be a tasks already done by maintainers). Finally, I take a look at the ebuild to see if there are issue(s) This is all. > And congrats on making dev Thanks ;) Regards Agostino --nextPart2700255.gOERULAnZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABCgAGBQJO6ym9AAoJEOTDgjZ80txdWKoIAKrWANOjA9mqgRBAlIs7YP1b j/eooE1YqqgSLQpnr8mFB6wW58wDynp3PwVY7+aTqF0JV31PpPPFb9ZdF0MpNhKy qoBiLY+ZpLdS82g5a0azkqM71mZOsRUhMcIx+AP1rsk+tkb9Frnl6rqZXjKpjtvN DWwbk0bTxCYQ7Nc1OpK5DlS1Hv7v//gnfRa36JS7cZcx2RjJgL1zjqsNTx/RuJH4 i+nlx5JdQzkjZilxJ0QTLRtUfWBcWgkhzRv3WrcX80cylHYWBOjSx/rILP9cDRh6 8hdNISmWzX5Q+FlvSHexQNIlrBiBcB1Syhmv3Z9pLAnf1zrXEeP0uP4ECyzy7Pc= =Ejjs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2700255.gOERULAnZp--