From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MeHej-0001i6-N1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:06:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8C99E01C4; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9366E01C4 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3E966ED5 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:06:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.976 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.976 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.444, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hEVbO3TtJFLM for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DE867286 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MeHeW-0000z8-AL for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:06:44 +0200 Received: from 91.85.162.239 ([91.85.162.239]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:06:44 +0200 Received: from slong by 91.85.162.239 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:06:44 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steven J Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant' Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:04:19 +0100 Organization: Friendly-Coders Message-ID: <2915979.scyzOdHmJ5@news.friendly-coders.info> References: <90b936c0908121058y5fd25cfcm67a19761b1130896@mail.gmail.com> <200908122041.34205.scarabeus@gentoo.org> <20090812194656.47300704@snowcone> <20090813135658.2d497f7b@snowcone> <44655500.sygxnxrhqW@news.friendly-coders.info> <20090813193451.31961a95@snowcone> <3865504.XFPclIEk6a@news.friendly-coders.info> <4A8A447F.5050708@gentoo.org> <12148931.hacUC6rHWN@news.friendly-coders.info> <4A8D21E7.2040604@trelane.net> <20090820155213.13474b14@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.85.162.239 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 32bf447f-4fef-4883-b919-c7a74f0f8a99 X-Archives-Hash: 44a9ad5be925917c142331d2a3f0cfb1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > I look forward to seeing Funtoo's creation of EAPI funtoo-2. > Well judging by your EAPI-2, I'd prefer it. Apart from USE-deps, there's been no discussion apart from under your supervision on bugzie. nonfatal? (or w/e it's called.) Who came up with that idea, and why did you ignore the --or-die option that's already been discussed? If you want exceptions, try C++ (better than you're currently doing.) This is shellscript. I'd like to moot to the Council that we hold off on EAPI-2 profiles, and go with EAPI-1 plus USE-deps and BASH-3.2_p17 (honestly, you thought 4 was ready?!) til we get this mess sorted. -- #friendly-coders -- We're friendly but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)