From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SXRBK-00012L-Uz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:05:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D993CE07B9; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gg0-f181.google.com (mail-gg0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0099E0777 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnv5 with SMTP id v5so8704560ggn.40 for ; Wed, 23 May 2012 23:04:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q5CCdjWq3Qg5eK6kapiMV2of0Kv7cYFEzTFdKwmqi/E=; b=Msbp79M2TIUJn4HXeXmxAaQ3MyxY+2xFC+srNSCpVNP4Baj1igY1T/rNKP8A7ctAbO ROsjJ0ukOeRHrNl8NVVzVMSPTiSltAWHtV4cVI8nZw+ccpzsvMH8yDHyBegY+oRPtOBU OwJcKEDvFJrArpPdtM/8URg+R/RSERACV1fNBg40mKGeKU5GmsA42fkNJfOO4H5mIdsR SJtgvlgTPDzlSOwVnWzEsSgHpMMJmpiUjh7JkgrrG34cxeKaluJOEwRPZ+zguO7KxEpv Ukk7Q6T/2sxQI8mvdEAP5qmWfmaVMMu60PBIZoV6NkMs7/cZ060SA8QJ6727J+gJs+CO eEVQ== Received: by 10.50.207.38 with SMTP id lt6mr15291190igc.34.1337839497998; Wed, 23 May 2012 23:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smorgbox.localnet (65-128-181-111.mpls.qwest.net. [65.128.181.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bj4sm3802241igc.16.2012.05.23.23.04.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 May 2012 23:04:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Douglas To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 01:04:48 -0500 Message-ID: <2887754.yItCG0zenD@smorgbox> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.3.6-pf+; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20120524075658.19d23efd@pomiocik.lan> References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org> <1473095.PKeReGjyol@smorgbox> <20120524075658.19d23efd@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3889590.JoZ4B6PXOA"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: deb7720f-6146-495f-b5e9-ca15c3f6f799 X-Archives-Hash: 6f844d0dcba49b06f59aa048c79bbca1 --nextPart3889590.JoZ4B6PXOA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Thursday, May 24, 2012 07:56:58 AM Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:14:53 -0500 >=20 > Dan Douglas wrote: > > If not I will be leaving Gentoo for Funtoo in the near future, thou= gh > > there are disadvantages to doing this I don't look forward to deali= ng > > with. >=20 > Most of us will probably be doing that :P. Eh sorry that wasn't meant to be antagonistic. I'll still have Gentoo b= oxen to=20 deal with. I just need to be able to use git on the tree (even without = the=20 full history is perfectly fine) to ease the difficulty of local overlay= =20 management. Glad to hear that will be possible, or at least somewhat ea= sier. --=20 Dan Douglas --nextPart3889590.JoZ4B6PXOA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+9z4IACgkQMmyDamdg+Mw0GwCglhqL7OEN07yCQ3nKpHpfFY9m uwQAoLDYDUDjIQxuJTnBD51vNmJR67Xr =6+mF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3889590.JoZ4B6PXOA--