* Re: [gentoo-dev] arches.desc & GLEP 72 (was: Re: [gentoo-project] Items for Council Agenda, May 14)
2017-05-06 14:34 ` [gentoo-dev] arches.desc & GLEP 72 (was: Re: [gentoo-project] Items for Council Agenda, May 14) Andreas K. Huettel
@ 2017-05-06 16:35 ` Michał Górny
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michał Górny @ 2017-05-06 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev, gentoo-project
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1495 bytes --]
On sob, 2017-05-06 at 16:34 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag, 29. April 2017, 19:00:34 CEST schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > The Gentoo Council will be meeting in two weeks. If anyone has any
> > issues we need to discuss, please let me know and I'll put it on the
> > agenda. Thanks.
>
> I've converted the arches.desc proposal into a GLEP, taking (some of) the
> mailing list comments into account.
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:72
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge/GLEP:72
>
> (the texts are identical at the moment, but if there are additional comments I
> can more easily adapt the version in my user space).
>
> I would like the council to talk about it and potentially give it a go-ahead.
>
> An implementation is still missing though.
>
...and a rationale section to describe why you did the things this way.
Few notes:
1. I think your example is a bit misleading -- unless I'm missing
something, mips would be 'unstable' right now, and m68k would be
'testing'.
2. I can't say I like using magical keywords like 'testing'
and 'unstable'; they're going to be confusing long-term (compare:
the mess with stable/exp/dev for profiles). But I don't have a very good
idea how to it better right now.
3. What is the use case for 'broken'? Are we ever going to use that?
Plus, you have a few typos, you need to wikify it and other minor blah
blah.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 963 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread