From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F29C139694 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49EB721C07B; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout04.plus.net (avasout04.plus.net [212.159.14.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D14FC21C04E for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.6.147] ([146.198.40.10]) by avasout04 with smtp id 9n7H1v0060D95ga01n7Kz2; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:07:19 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Groywg9C c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=yn+RW+FPi/EeJkSCDbeReQ==:117 a=yn+RW+FPi/EeJkSCDbeReQ==:17 a=13zjGPudsaEWiJwPRgMA:9 a=DyPTMalAAAAA:8 a=7mOBRU54AAAA:8 a=Eo61JIirHGf12vrHuUgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=R_FLaLtHqHqGeoPA_D0A:9 a=ONNS8QRKHyMA:10 a=xvM-z41T7ZKtTu_oIGgG:22 a=wa9RWnbW_A1YIeRBVszw:22 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ?? To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1492508657.18287.1.camel@gentoo.org> From: "M. J. Everitt" Openpgp: id=BA266E0525CFAB101523351B4C30334F93C22371 Message-ID: <27496b2a-a662-06dc-56ed-207fae84c3b6@iee.org> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:07:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1492508657.18287.1.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KTWU9hECmBJq9g30KSXE7baththTvR1wX" X-Archives-Salt: ce681b97-3509-4d8a-8b59-c97330254e7a X-Archives-Hash: 0918e353a4d23b5cba16aa0cfad39174 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KTWU9hECmBJq9g30KSXE7baththTvR1wX Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="FI3TgaNaeXo2ssHrasbXGpX0cim28rhPW" From: "M. J. Everitt" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <27496b2a-a662-06dc-56ed-207fae84c3b6@iee.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ?? References: <1492508657.18287.1.camel@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1492508657.18287.1.camel@gentoo.org> --FI3TgaNaeXo2ssHrasbXGpX0cim28rhPW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/04/17 10:44, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > =C3=9Chel kenal p=C3=A4eval, T, 18.04.2017 kell 11:16, kirjutas J=C3=B6= rg Schaible: >> Hi Tomas, >> >> Tomas Mozes wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible < >>> joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64: >>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showm >>>> sg=3D1 >>>> >>>> However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable >>>> for me. >>>> Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, >>>> because >>>> there seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and >>>> one >>>> unstable: https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc >>>> >>>> Can someone shed some light on this? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> J=C3=B6rg >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> On which platform do you have it unstable? The packages problem is >>> probably related to: >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D612178 >> Amd64. >> >> Yes, it might be the same problem. The ebuild for gcc-4.5.0-r3 on my >> machine=20 >> lists amd64 as unstable after synching the tree while the ebuild >> available=20 >> over packages.gentoo.org has a stable version in KEYWORDS. >> >> Even if some GIT mirrors might be out of sync, it does not explain >> why=20 >> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc lists the same >> version=20 >> more than once. > This is a packages.gentoo.org Ruby on Rails webapp bug, and has > absolutely nothing to do with some package being stable on an > architecture or not. Don't let that disturb you. > > > Mart > +1 CONFIRMED but fix unknown at present. Gcc is /not/ the only package that is affected by the Ruby-on-Rails bug. RESOLVED:DUPLICATE :] --FI3TgaNaeXo2ssHrasbXGpX0cim28rhPW-- --KTWU9hECmBJq9g30KSXE7baththTvR1wX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY9fNkAAoJEN7KWvRhIveD6nwQALEgPUR/4S6Em6SdwximMtTr I/yyQZ1mvnfKZN7cdZPRBPlOLV92o8vzFgasNGwhVMM6Fw1bnzX7MaItMzM/Hhd+ GDb0qMja9GOH4n6P4Js0RJ99EhyechEQ6kzpp9inwno//ONeNFvt3a9fE8v9dy97 44R4vxVRHD0XPSfZdAs5ZRjvZeRYHWqK1uwpRO7/7r2g/dHelhAOWG2k8em72EuE kg1w/5ikIY+W97ozy0Tp2NzgckRLoSspTDMuejmgnuGpisTxnsyXYYJW68na/+U+ LHmiHrVgsGFDxw1pbPbll0pLDOwOHV/qsiGz95gHAiGalDUruCt14tpbFY/GAe9H oJ+rXBy3XrS5SpsNDeQJnPEqV50Fli7zd2RPFfNRCaKBYZlZjdzp8TP7oxtGOf3a IIBl7I33+kK1AT7vRf5UxE156Ssz36Qr8nKundxnjKZ5CPwdOxgELf52GoIgEiCT An/R3zuOnSasBgk9ESrc8cXvh96o1xFgw1R+KJKC9oK9amVStI43xEtRqwko23Z+ 6Z1QdLODEwvj6/CrMYyF6zdjBdo1CXw76XrjXAgWPA1JUMeTSDHxVayBtZUOU/gj nxd8Z9SsYyeNuF6rj+Ad8SpHWVzJocGKTGYqZL7SdC2MVPgOLj/hpZLUZOX+Orh0 UCRf3Eebd6zfgNNGWxBk =HeYe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KTWU9hECmBJq9g30KSXE7baththTvR1wX--