From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E9n1e-0002qD-CB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:02:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7TGxI57019903; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:59:18 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7TGtUZb019324 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:55:30 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583379A969D for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:57:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wac [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18449-11 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www2.chlastej.net (unknown [82.99.172.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFB29A969C for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:57:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:57:16 +0200 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <271732886.20050829185716@gentoo.org> To: Chris Gianelloni Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles In-Reply-To: <1125331147.1964.100.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler> <28B2A791-A149-4B58-86D8-8DD349D081E5@gentoo.org> <1125331147.1964.100.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------D513BE32FA7E8E8" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.2 (20050629) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.136 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=-0.071, BAYES_50=0.001, PRIORITY_NO_NAME=1.097, WEIRD_PORT=0.109] X-Spam-Level: * X-Archives-Salt: e0754c0c-3403-4565-8936-7705dc10918e X-Archives-Hash: acd4543b0c101c114870bf8b51e82c57 ------------D513BE32FA7E8E8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A29.8.2005, 17:59:07, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I honestly don't think it would be a good idea to forget the lessons of t= he > past and start bloating the profiles with tons of "desktop" and "server" > profiles, among anything else people would want. After all, as soon as we= did > a "desktop" profile, then we would have requests for "gnome" and "kde" > sub-profiles. Uhm, we don't need desktop profile, the current profiles are desktop ones -= a pretty bloated desktop, but whatever... I'd really welcome server profile though, basically w/ the set of USE flags that hardened profile provides, b= ut without hardened features. --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEB= A3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;) ------------D513BE32FA7E8E8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDEz5shxfV/c66PZ4RAkQxAKCbZswZAYMPykqs/qguQJxybBLGAQCcDMae q/auuU4s4U5Oh71ju1SXM88= =A6EB -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------D513BE32FA7E8E8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list