From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2862D1382C5 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5769AE0948; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1447EE093B for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:43:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Andreas Sturmlechner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: "Wolfgang E. Sanyer" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] flag-o-matic.eclass: get rid of eutils in In-Reply-To: References: <5252907.rdbgypaU67@tuxbook> <20210331101323.5a35d8ac@sf> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4801412.Qq0lBPeGtt"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: b7e05db3-16d3-4cb8-9910-f55af8263089 X-Archives-Hash: c62ffedf8f8904bbc38082c7b86c5ec4 --nextPart4801412.Qq0lBPeGtt Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; protected-headers="v1" From: Andreas Sturmlechner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: "Wolfgang E. Sanyer" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] flag-o-matic.eclass: get rid of eutils in In-Reply-To: References: <5252907.rdbgypaU67@tuxbook> <20210331101323.5a35d8ac@sf> On Mittwoch, 31. M=E4rz 2021 12:03:33 CEST Wolfgang E. Sanyer wrote: > I'm curious - why the split e.g. test-flag-PROG() and _test-flag-PROG()? = Is > this stylistic, or does it serve a functional purpose? (Hah, "functional", > get it? Because they're functions?!? We prepend `_` to signify internal API. The existing function name needs to= =20 stay until <=3DEAPI-7 support is gone in order not to break potential consu= mers=20 even outside of genoo.git. Regards --nextPart4801412.Qq0lBPeGtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEE/x0UfMgLbk/MiQ+AUIqgAODug+AFAmBlzd5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEZG MUQxNDdDQzgwQjZFNEZDQzg5MEY4MDUwOEFBMDAwRTBFRTgzRTAACgkQUIqgAODu g+D02wf/ZteA9SrOQAmmMUs0zZTaO8y3DlJmSPZnuN/JQjXEtzHXKhSX+jiOF8Ld ReMb/xUEjHnVehAMIDKEpKdHVJZUdNh8rpYSoTimfztWOJEFs/u6b32A0PrjiAwJ uIvIHqPJT1ki51sKjhA5thSRCUvu/Gfj6sVgG5aA+WYaKF3u5NKxawXFvUp1siIN AQfiY/o2C0FtvyzmqHmbc7Nnb90RmaPprZzAMacmWZ73i+DmrTH0+dwgBReHMyp5 8x7zUZKzDoPR8v1v7wpT+GzyaTB+BjxXbmi4bXY70Sd6hFrbuy0Mixb4vvKS7En7 J4ctPhX1fdy91EolVMswm2qlM4km+Q== =f8cq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4801412.Qq0lBPeGtt--