From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OP3B9-0001d3-Tu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:42:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED63EE094E; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.jolexa.net (mail.jolexa.net [69.164.203.224]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9610CE0944 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.jolexa.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 0C5FB5DB8B; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:41:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-gr2 (2008-06-10) on helios.jolexa.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5-gr2 Received: from mail.jolexa.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.jolexa.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A735DB4D for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:41:51 +0000 From: Jeremy Olexa To: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposing fundamental changes to DevRel In-Reply-To: <4C196595.20600@gentoo.org> References: <4C196595.20600@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <2474efeb4cc708c28993e583a77b6d76@localhost> X-Sender: darkside@gentoo.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.4-trunk X-Archives-Salt: 31c4d522-72d6-4b52-a126-785c47598dd5 X-Archives-Hash: fd21e0f054c61f12b5b84d9774e2c671 On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:00:21 +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > yngwin's devaway message still reads > > "inactive, pending resolution of devrel issue". > > yngwin retired. I woudn't go as far as saying that his case made him > retire but I definitely say that _DevRel failed on his case_. > I believe I had enough insight to be able to say. How do you have "enough insight" to know this stuff? Was it public? I consider myself pretty active in the community and don't know a thing about yngwin's case. It is all pretty vague to me. /me shrugs. > I would like to propose these fundamental changes to DevRel: > I can't comment on the rest due to the above. -Jeremy