From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE31F139694 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED261E0BF4; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward5j.cmail.yandex.net (forward5j.cmail.yandex.net [5.255.227.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92CEFE0824 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3j.mail.yandex.net (smtp3j.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.68]) by forward5j.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id EA66B2193E; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 00:56:38 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp3j.mail.yandex.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 42215624100A; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 00:56:37 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp3j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id hL3XhQO7Ki-uaKqr7SB; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:56:36 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 0 From: "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: vim@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 04:56:36 +0700 Message-ID: <2441749.gsc6QkMBCV@note> In-Reply-To: <15162118.1WtZIBpG5a@note> References: <15162118.1WtZIBpG5a@note> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 9549cf2a-5686-41ec-b2af-a25b156ea95c X-Archives-Hash: 4c225367429bdd4b4353b04808b01fa0 1) Dear Vim Team, can we hear your opinions? 2) I'd like to know if discussion participants really differs my eselect-php- like suggestion (where all scripts goes to another directory, controlled by neither of vims, and then users should/can manually dis-/enable modules for each of vim they want) from Ciaran's suggestion of making a directory common for all vims, patch all the vims, and force *developers* to check modules and put them there only after check modules under both (currently) vims (as side effect leave neovim users without modules until developers finaly finish that work). And what point they (participants) really supports? 3) Again, dear Vim Team, please come here, and take a part in the discussion.