From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699AF1396D0 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2017 19:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAC851FC049; Sat, 26 Aug 2017 19:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 773061FC00D for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2017 19:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FBD1341807; Sat, 26 Aug 2017 19:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <22945.53181.678629.575249@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 21:45:01 +0200 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites:sys-apps/more In-Reply-To: References: <20170826192714.GA22353@unrandom> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp+signed+6ep/KBIdR5AU2z0"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 1d62a3c6-3344-408f-890b-3b727a72a6ea X-Archives-Hash: 0117153c0d08ffbd682fec7432984d01 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --pgp+signed+6ep/KBIdR5AU2z0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2017, Matt Turner wrote: > Isn't it just part of util-linux? The HOMEPAGE link makes me think > so, and my system has /bin/more which is owned by util-linux, which > is part of @system. Seems silly to have a separate package for it in > the tree on those grounds alone. It is/was intended for FreeBSD where there is no util-linux. "No major keywords" in the mask comment is a little misleading. Ulrich --pgp+signed+6ep/KBIdR5AU2z0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZoc+8AAoJEMMJBoUcYcJzwRAIAIyz0zuZFcaMCUM4DsqT+pdO ++3nDEwzpXPPPpe72WSfaSe3U3QsRKG8rkIdidcgeD/6zhO9VpxfDipI/QRT4Gcy aUG3azbhKEL/3EkDmwuxSuwLmXksDCrYs1iUqZgVc7kMG/TbW2lgXhPzrawHQxXt dl/m1AC+MoZkD9BKNPTtSD+TC42czH+aXVffVOzctXcaxl9OrowG+VBBVJfp88a7 f6F7qcbhKRBNBdSC8b5NVe3SezgmyDJ6XhOsnxl0m4VR4OnqRj6EGUv39ecto2k1 nRbhUhSW5ExhWRTzOynfnzLAQDoouBa2QmmBVY7+4gof+huNYvIQrVvQuTJ6kzE= =5s8q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp+signed+6ep/KBIdR5AU2z0--