From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B306139694 for ; Thu, 4 May 2017 08:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4CCCE0D10; Thu, 4 May 2017 08:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CFB6E0CE9 for ; Thu, 4 May 2017 08:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CDBA3416EB; Thu, 4 May 2017 08:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <22794.59164.203668.872074@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 10:32:28 +0200 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: meson.eclass for the meson build system In-Reply-To: <20170504031143.GA16993@linux1> References: <20170504031143.GA16993@linux1> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp+signed+4nFxvnp+IaPJaCm"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 74645ca4-5bf9-4cd4-b439-9d8b54f74603 X-Archives-Hash: 4ed34cff253f784558253bea74095527 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --pgp+signed+4nFxvnp+IaPJaCm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>>>> On Wed, 3 May 2017, William Hubbs wrote: > # @VARIABLE: mymesonargs I guess this is modeled after cmake-utils.eclass, but should eclass variables really use the "my" prefix? There seems to be no formal rule for this, but numerous devmanual examples (like MY_PV) suggest that MY is available for internal ebuild use. So maybe mesonargs or emesonargs would be a better name here? Ulrich --pgp+signed+4nFxvnp+IaPJaCm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZCucZAAoJEMMJBoUcYcJzFHcH/2vFACx4gtB5kFjx3zF/X3PX BL9qTTpVOV+RqLs1AbAP5SEv69zHYgJsXRcSBrTT5ug3p35FCRCNE6pIanPnPm3k ZzqPez8JAOS9uFqV7luO0KlPy6HhKn7wQGJIHPlUfjIC5knLruE2/+578kw2HDKB jPWjq7AsMaisIsdf4F3FLT9g0JebAqfmVgj4f54c2vL+mtSMnYqXaj+sA0+wDdjC 67gETrv6kBh69ouYmJFkyh9VscKxwz2ttnCnVVl/+9kVUCVHDZwxaNjFqEoWzETg DvYsABkq/8J+JMkvJmdQkka31vy5WJEjLI+7AgjDcIDrZssmUDpXziaa9zDf95I= =kUJE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp+signed+4nFxvnp+IaPJaCm--