From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18ADD158086 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C1362BC06D; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813232BC069 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Don't use UIDs and GIDs below 100 without QA approval To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <570d3b72-35f4-51ea-fe91-25d49057a9d8@gentoo.org> From: Joonas Niilola Message-ID: <225f3612-6c4e-b5e1-aeb0-70ce73119b3a@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:40:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <570d3b72-35f4-51ea-fe91-25d49057a9d8@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TSxPCv5j7JxHdc7PELy8hJZZRa0i9CneG" X-Archives-Salt: a53b8d1f-1f5e-46d8-98ed-b97a84a7a155 X-Archives-Hash: 5fbdf79716114462c4757b43eb0a8f34 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --TSxPCv5j7JxHdc7PELy8hJZZRa0i9CneG Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="FkWZXhZJXqfHCNfDpJvHcmhUbtR4lGwbN"; protected-headers="v1" From: Joonas Niilola To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <225f3612-6c4e-b5e1-aeb0-70ce73119b3a@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Don't use UIDs and GIDs below 100 without QA approval References: <570d3b72-35f4-51ea-fe91-25d49057a9d8@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <570d3b72-35f4-51ea-fe91-25d49057a9d8@gentoo.org> --FkWZXhZJXqfHCNfDpJvHcmhUbtR4lGwbN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11.11.2021 13.34, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 11/11/2021 11.59, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> We could: >> >> - Open some part of the range between 500 and 1000. For example, >> =C2=A0=C2=A0 500..799, which would leave 200 IDs for dynamic allocatio= n. >=20 > +1, since I am not aware of any significant downsides doing so. >=20 > Could you elaborate why the range 500-799 only leaves us with 200 IDs? >=20 > - Flow >=20 >=20 Read it like this: Only 800-999 gets freed with this suggestion, as 500...999 is currently reserved for dynamic allocation. And >1000 is also reserved. -- juippis --FkWZXhZJXqfHCNfDpJvHcmhUbtR4lGwbN-- --TSxPCv5j7JxHdc7PELy8hJZZRa0i9CneG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEEltRJ9L6XRmDQCngHc4OUK43AaWIFAmGNATtfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDk2 RDQ0OUY0QkU5NzQ2NjBEMDBBNzgwNzczODM5NDJCOERDMDY5NjIACgkQc4OUK43A aWLb2wgAhhYKPetRPwj46wFKeCzYPciAVGgT6LuNSqtR8G2u1cOyAZ/qTqbMz7e7 Ew2ZNW+VvZ8f9Z6MDlWIl3Xla/WVpah5W4DVT+5TJ0VRxsz2frc7gxZVJDZhNrnU i7O+qYHIGcjxQXo2cLb5vbfpZeaQEWlvFaS61PaxnZUnDucw4UTH+FXqZOBS80zF sqoMlDXfZvdgV5qE/12bDPWw2Gtr5KCytZdY+eYbfwzKnuNXRNaa7fE9d1vigCwb quEFOdoKWxNHuaYV7Ip/+NNGI9Hv6IKnBmr8N7vM9peYsikQhWY+V6qRH+YbtXvl RS3QVVgTdvENQrxlxyhtcRwbt8us4A== =isdF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TSxPCv5j7JxHdc7PELy8hJZZRa0i9CneG--