From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-36034-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1M66DO-0008Ve-Dh
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 17:01:26 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0299E03E5;
	Mon, 18 May 2009 17:01:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com (mail-fx0-f219.google.com [209.85.220.219])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8366CE03E5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 17:01:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so3171888fxm.34
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 10:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=RxXzvOn2eJ+DnbJMzp2nVbNiPaiO7z4QlJF3BRwT1kA=;
        b=D6baWiiqd4lWpOIc8JDUXVzwTcn+0JRNIcMGkef48AVpIPcJBRPV5VdKVHUOk7ZPUz
         ZSTxywBweGo7I707QWF3v4xXTbXEiobH9AbnHPRTwqxskvMUYsGmD7rpdjVWv8Oz2BxL
         1VpUnvouxVB5LYOUgRAXVTjWeY7F9A4dyF2Po=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=EO2XwssdjrzWHRKXKWX3O7FaeQhCxsHJJyd7mewlNFKaJot3KNG3PDtAdejqdNZPTk
         v68waYqrp3aqjF9nOAdQwmmboZJYxi80oXtRyfPRzFdzyv945yhqcTSuGCgySMPq8ssc
         kTyVDzrtZuBkLghpAUBIqpWkVPqk+y9RdykRg=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.92.8 with SMTP id u8mr4191630mul.12.1242666082396; Mon, 18 
	May 2009 10:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090518175142.5d56abc8@snowcone>
References: <225000070905180304u49e9a50btcc0f8935368afc03@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20090518152155.7c856095@snowmobile>
	 <225000070905180942j12efe6d4s3fab7362abdf4668@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20090518175142.5d56abc8@snowcone>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:01:22 +0300
Message-ID: <225000070905181001r4f9a9535rdbf0d07c4e6eabf0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] blocking mixed versions of split QT libraries
From: Alex Alexander <alex.alexander@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 208ba61e-83d5-4ad7-b0cb-04f9cd7fae17
X-Archives-Hash: 60b0308c62feaf22aa015a596532030c

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 19:51, Ciaran McCreesh
<ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> It wouldn't, although it would be fixed as soon as someone tried to
> install a package with a Qt dep.
>
> Dependencies the way they are now aren't really expressive enough to
> handle what you're after -- split packages are considered unrelated.

so the RDEPEND in qting-edge seems to be the only working solution for now...

is paludis expected to behave like portage in the near future
regarding these blocks?

are there any plans to add support for these kinds of cases in the
PMS? other sets of packages could probably benefit from such a feature
as well.

thanks

--
Alex Alexander || wired
Gentoo QT && KDE Herd Tester
http://www.linuxized.com