From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5300198005 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73F31E083D; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com (mail-ee0-f45.google.com [74.125.83.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64858E0802 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b57so312786eek.32 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:16:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SmWDkH2rm0R0BZB+Lc7i+nSbrN3AnOI/M9OYcaPVhzY=; b=VJMU6KobABx7vygxrK6ezbF8hYH79BXDvhugU6on5NR3l+qpefPRXIEDqjYmF7DtiU RNY2MNBx/fZRCmWBbLJQ36ioRM7JiuWXflaS1GDBH4U82r+In3dfG8U38stMV9ZQ4OUv DZPQFEBCezp45I4FhFWyQMXMrwsfng279R9Q+SAKtzqH8dCqIUlpgfQ+LfhktKU3L3eH WoPuibQwG/bftDzbtzDroXHPRlgfIQOUxzzS71LysdMJraW8JMnZ/zm+L1nlDjrdElWG Ne/32aTIgFufBRYi449Y04lw2+mmwGeMBcT15DiXtymHFSebKOoYiGsErYxeWNemlGRv t8cA== X-Received: by 10.14.183.198 with SMTP id q46mr5056744eem.1.1361960215904; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:16:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from virtuoso.localnet ([212.67.80.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm5577193eep.11.2013.02.27.02.16.54 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:16:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: Theo Chatzimichos From: Theo Chatzimichos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Bugday Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:19:59 +0100 Message-ID: <2236116.pTSTeBVNT8@virtuoso> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.2 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.9.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8410557.o4VLlJgHRb"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Archives-Salt: a20a17f2-9844-4de4-a78e-bc7abda0f5c7 X-Archives-Hash: 32536d29c0a8d0f4048c71bc6147a6b3 --nextPart8410557.o4VLlJgHRb Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Tuesday 26 of February 2013 22:28:13 Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > On 27/02/2013 11:39, Pavlos Ratis wrote: > >> Hello everyone, > >> > >> I would like to announce you a new try to 'revive' the Bugday event. > >> As most of the open source projects have their own bugday, I thought > >> it would be great to have this event back. For those who don't know, > >> its a monthly 24h event that takes place in #gentoo-bugs. Its goal is > >> to close as many bugs as possible . You don't have to be a Gentoo > >> expert to participate. Those days are a great way to start joining the > >> Gentoo community, improving Bugzilla's and Wiki's quality and looking > >> for a mentor to begin the recruitment process. The upcoming bugday > >> event is this Saturday and I hope this event will continue in the next > >> months. I have created a wiki page for the event[1] and I added some > >> guidelines. I have also created a related blog post about the > >> event[2]. > >> > >> I have listed some maintainer-wanted and maintainer-need bugs and > >> Bugzilla admins also re-enabled the bugday flag. I would like to ask > >> the Gentoo project teams to start using this flag to their bugs that > >> think that are good to start and enable the flag at them. It would be > >> great to a have a really big list with 'good to start' bugs. > >> > >> It's the first time after a long time that this event will take place, > >> so I am looking forward to your participation both users and > >> developers and your feedback. > >> > >> [1] http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Bugday > >> [2] http://blog.dastergon.gr/gentoo-bugday/ > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Pavlos > > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for your work, it will be great to see Bugday happening again. > > > > What about the old bugday webpage[1]? It seems a bit broken at the moment, > > but may be useful to get running again. > > Is the code available somewhere? Who has access to the login in the > > footer? > > antarus@flycatcher /var/svnroot/bugday $ grep svnbugday /etc/group > svnbugday:x:4005:gurligebis > > It is there, but only gurligebis has r/w. We should migrate it to > git.o.g.o if possible (all the secrets should be in a separate > infra-owned repo, basically.) > > I have no idea who has access to login. > > > Best regards, > > Michael > > > > [1] http://bugday.gentoo.org/ I already sent a tarball with the code to Pavlos, let him decide if he wants to move it to git.overlays.g.o or replace it with something else Theo --nextPart8410557.o4VLlJgHRb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlEt3dMACgkQjDdoMVfcAHi/SQCgo/qDUGmE6dMawOO4eJ/V3pVU ftEAn2QHvqZ8ksoPgrMG6Mh9Tj+w9/Mt =a2U9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8410557.o4VLlJgHRb--