>>>>> On Sat, 21 May 2016, Michał Górny wrote:

> I see the following possibilities:

> 1. We start explicitly listing linguas_* in all ebuilds, no matter
> how tiny they are. Maintainers are required to keep IUSE up-to-date
> and users are forced to rebuild a lot.

Why would users have to rebuild more often? Language support in a
package will change with a version bump, when they must rebuild in any
case.

> This is also a QA violation in terms of invalid use of USE flags.

I fail to see why this would be a QA violation.

> [...]

Ulrich