From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FDF59CA3 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E67821C04F; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA5A21C03F for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u26JSYwf003718; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:28:34 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.8/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u26JSYQ3020033; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:28:34 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id u26JSX3F020029; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:28:33 +0100 Message-ID: <22236.34017.614512.823764@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:28:33 +0100 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Davide Pesavento , "Justin \" , qa@gentoo.org, cardoe@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing In-Reply-To: <20160306193122.7894368b.mgorny@gentoo.org> References: <20160306120119.2df280d6.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20160306120422.409eae38.mgorny@gentoo.org> <56DC72F3.2040509@gentoo.org> <20160306191845.5c0a592d.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20160306193122.7894368b.mgorny@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp+signed+yg5x6BAkPAcjYRm"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 0210a412-889d-47a9-b900-e9fe797cd7b1 X-Archives-Hash: 9f5928892d7c7aac12d29706710e6174 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --pgp+signed+yg5x6BAkPAcjYRm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Micha=B3 G=F3rny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 > Davide Pesavento wrote: >> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are needed: >> media-libs/gstreamer:1.0 >> =3F > Prolly. > Just to be clear, I have no clue what the original use of > was and what the final outcome of this will be. This thread was > established mostly in order to determine that. I'd wait for ulm to > turn up and have some suggestions ;-). :) No idea what the original purpose was, but and are specified in GLEP 56 [1]: - Each XML tag allows 0 or more nested XML tags whose character data is a valid CP or CPV as defined by the Gentoo Development Manual - Ebuild File Format [2]. - Each XML tag allows 0 or more nested XML tags whose character data is a valid category. So looks like a version is allowed, but not a slot. CCing Cardoe. What was the original intention behind and =3F= Ulrich [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:56 [2] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html --pgp+signed+yg5x6BAkPAcjYRm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW3ITeAAoJEMMJBoUcYcJzucwH/308re7Yavu83Zm/CVhiYjQq 4zKF2IV7LMcDgoiFE6vgpCF73pGrAS2aHnxRbDQZGq82u2+LmH6Zrn3/N0wlo7Oy kC5oKFmZ+Dnv+8ICxIXiibfrMW0Ztx62aufopYpKakytj0D/xciZzncUXG/VB4ak QmcU3WdHgoyDaoqlCoDOprmTmI3kB6Rv/kF/ESDADu+T1cn3sKt/YBb//gOUB4ea FYZiAlaRAn2MWK6EdIbi6w0ksLmQrD6yJe61PTm7Og8Ly0FB4+XCLEcPfUB8po06 twfNZrBB1ThNzwXsmK1fhDzwgDePGaKymNBTEkl4l135zfdu3LvTWlt9bjOmZpw= =zqgB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp+signed+yg5x6BAkPAcjYRm--