>>>>> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015, James Le Cuirot wrote:

>> >  # EAPI=4 is required for meaningful MULTILIB_USEDEP.
>> >  case ${EAPI:-0} in
>> > -	4|5) ;;
>> > +	[456]) ;;
>> >  	*) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported" ;;
>> >  esac
>> 
>> Why not write this as 4|5|6) for better readability? It's not even
>> shorter with the brackets.

> Or [4-6]) perhaps? It would not get any longer for later versions. ;)

I'd rather avoid any syntax that suggests that EAPI names are single
characters.

Ulrich