From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j1S0CHcb029549 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:12:17 GMT Received: from uconnvm.uconn.edu ([137.99.26.3]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D5YWF-0005mk-1V for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:12:15 +0000 Received: from [137.99.149.56] [137.99.149.56] by UConnVM.UConn.Edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 3A0) via TCP with ESMTP ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:12:03 EST Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: <20050227232437.73061.qmail@web50407.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050227232437.73061.qmail@web50407.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <21a021a517c4edee5b81325ad4adfcb8@gentoo.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lina Pezzella Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude? Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:12:15 -0500 To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Archives-Salt: 6cd38569-16b4-4111-8795-7b31546f3c8f X-Archives-Hash: 0dd9e893c7a98c682940ae3b6bb63b3d -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 27, 2005, at 6:24 PM, Jason S wrote: > > --- Lina Pezzella wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> This thread brings up a very good point. There are >> little children >> using our distribution, and they should not be >> exposed to dirty words >> such as the one being disputed in this thread. There >> are other packages >> that are also questionable too. "BitchX" comes to >> mind, and "Evolution" >> is on the top of my die-package-die list. We >> certainly wouldn't want >> little children asking about that, now would we? >> >> In light of the above, I suggest that in the >> interest of being sure not >> to offend anyone, we remove the three aforementioned >> packages and any >> others that might be offensive. It's not censorship, >> it's decency. > > Thanks for the mocking. :( I wasn't mocking you. I was making a point about the dangers of censorship. > > Well maybe we should have a vote if my moderating > services are no longer needed. I could find better > things to do with my time quite frankly. I just took > the job because it was policy and something I could do > in the background, and I took the heat from other > devs. It's boring and a thankless job. I even get > threats to my life sometimes, nevermind them sharing > their thoughts of what they think of me. ;) I never mentioned what I thought of you; please don't misrepresent my words. Furthermore, my post had to do with censoring Ciaran's package in the tree, not maintaining a level of politeness in a chat room. > > Maybe it's time to do something else. If that's the way you feel, then so be it. However, I think we would all hate to lose your valuable help in #gentoo. > > regards, > kutsuya (aka bit`) > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > Lina Pezzella Ebuild/Porting Co-Lead Gentoo for Mac OS X -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCImHfNJ9STR9DbYERAncXAJ9KyCZbUqsuCwwcLQHgL//Wxt2nGQCfbSMw 0AGCj40AdrzurCp84wNAWN4= =D289 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list