From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D22DE138334 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DBE3E08C2; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D18D1E088C for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c134-66.icpnet.pl [85.221.134.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5907E34B478; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <21518724cf0ba33246755519f9b221954d44ddae.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] @DISTFILE-REDISTRIBUTABLE license group From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: licenses Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 22:57:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <289b815331e4d29c9cb5bb7e5613e30ab6016806.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1aWafv4rLkI+jicIj78t" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 8150e1cf-66ff-4ae2-8bef-b476f4c9abea X-Archives-Hash: 900f34a222eb751a9673755422de1c2f --=-1aWafv4rLkI+jicIj78t Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 22:37 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > That's my initial thought as well but I'm going to check them, just in > > case. That is, unless the proposal is rejected. >=20 > Please check this, before we are going to decide on it. >=20 Verified. All licenses permit source redistribution. I'm not sure if SmartLabs really permit binary redist like we claim right now but it permits distributing 'exact copies'. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-1aWafv4rLkI+jicIj78t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl2Gjr1fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA5OfAgAn51B8rzjuEVfGNltunRxFi6Tg0bOany3JIORD/5ELx/H3czELWinjxIR SoQw55SImF73W2poq6M/lBS/xrrWAl+VeWzxfx4eD8gnhWOLUwlnUtxbmzCOWX5Z UyswXt/P8zOihglPkUU+3Yt+v9zosA6mTGtopFlumxEdqWiD20mnYS7kDIt4+JNF MXp7lWNyQwEpZnwFCZwqjAgf3qOXSYEAZJrt+jlMNNc1XVUKrTy7WIqO7kq3ONWg 3VLdM8AD1zHIvWg7lGMDu4kfEaJOJgeSJkRj/TXC4Y7SwaWOv80LM4gPYM0Tm1fL Qi/c22sI5FOtAUAN527n2jNeNfvpYg== =obXP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1aWafv4rLkI+jicIj78t--