From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BA0138247 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07528E0B45; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E42DFE0AD6 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.7/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s02IHpc1017672 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:17:51 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.7/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s02IHptU010311; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:17:51 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s02IHoVn010307; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:17:50 +0100 Message-ID: <21189.44366.754407.921500@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:17:50 +0100 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new global USE flag "srcdist" In-Reply-To: <20140102180258.477e0963@gentp.lnet> References: <21188.38566.180273.751353@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20140102065006.59a2bad9@caribou.gateway.pace.com> <52C58F8E.9050005@gentoo.org> <20140102172822.617e6452@gentp.lnet> <21189.39321.229948.547287@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20140102180258.477e0963@gentp.lnet> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp+signed+mZNYjwWjTqvSZIk"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d4f208de-f7a8-4a48-9978-6d00c05551b2 X-Archives-Hash: 6bc26d6b41095fd848fc0dadc0b65270 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --pgp+signed+mZNYjwWjTqvSZIk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>>>> On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Luis Ressel wrote: >> RESTRICT is somewhat complementary to LICENSE and cannot provide as >> much information. Especially, RESTRICT="mirror" doesn't say under >> what license the restricted pieces are, and doesn't allow for >> ACCEPT_LICENSE filtering. > But is this detailed information really neccessary? The use-case is > ensuring the legality of distfiles mirroring -- you're either > allowed to do it nor not, the exact license doesn't matter here. This is not primarily about distfiles mirroring, about about giving users a choice what distfiles they will accept on their systems (for whatever reasons, e.g. legal or philosophical). Besides, not all users are under the same legislation, which may affect their choice. Ulrich --pgp+signed+mZNYjwWjTqvSZIk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSxa1BAAoJEMMJBoUcYcJzztIIALF+1PvAkk83r0RiSx5v5NmO JtvI/Qw6Wp4OfzX9B/1fzvkaSmPmaghMCeLF2r2cGmZjfbknJICU/fFeoHwkmI+h ROLGxYgoc5jcJHxFQgPNuA5ewWnBYKDBExYCjEAqIbD0Y+qgYgo9/TBgeH0KGCOB uDwu/aTsFWcQIp0BunSF57PyC376H4WlnWMGG5RYX456mikhfKKRht8w2EShKPOJ S1N85hGA088xEk4TSPpxyRm/PUjjDhaBAIGOCA2Xcce/dNQnBKTgE0So1etGkTq5 9/kcn8HZ/Z5mR58cvZquGMDSfeiuv/72QXES5nFEroSYubMxeNPSyEuIR0xJoTY= =3Hfs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp+signed+mZNYjwWjTqvSZIk--