From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8E91388C1 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E60321C014; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 797ECE07EE for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.130] (CPE002401f30b73-CM78cd8ec1b205.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.138.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E06D1340C35 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <22227.64207.210350.425232@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <22230.43334.255937.387943@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> From: Ian Stakenvicius Message-ID: <210da6ab-068c-b4a0-d02d-520e239dc7e1@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:31:53 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <22230.43334.255937.387943@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ae22fc0b-ab3e-49bd-a91e-da7933a4e089 X-Archives-Hash: 513b720c3298fc26b5d48095b16d6554 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/03/16 03:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > How is it possible that we have 52 MiB of ChangeLog entries > generated in the 0.5 years since the git conversion, whereas we > had only a total of 103 MiB in the 13.5 years since ChangeLogs > were introduced in 2002? Certainly our commit rate hasn't > increased by more than an order of magnitude in the last half > year? > The content of a changelog entry from git is a lot bigger than it was just from echangelog, isn't it? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlbXI4kACgkQAJxUfCtlWe2gJwEA6EDRDBa94PuopiPc7lP/GAyw cTyWHzPznQpUGyMPXHsBAMQi+EluVkEkf6ilttjXw+XMqi//C0QyaT1jRhvRAprL =nIHW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----