From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062451381F3 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 15:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60EA4E0A6F; Sun, 12 May 2013 15:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46EABE0A63 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 15:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id r4CFmEqt013849; Sun, 12 May 2013 17:48:14 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.6/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r4CFmEM8019386; Sun, 12 May 2013 17:48:14 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r4CFmECa019384; Sun, 12 May 2013 17:48:14 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20879.47550.568189.770408@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 17:48:14 +0200 To: Markos Chandras Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, devmanual@gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: devmanual moved to github In-Reply-To: <518FAF6B.80501@gentoo.org> References: <518F7DE2.70703@gentoo.org> <20879.38369.270576.25249@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <518FAF6B.80501@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: 0733182b-7bf1-4f40-a49c-a1388ff5bd2a X-Archives-Hash: 7975fef9e667a768718d12d642a9bda4 >>>>> On Sun, 12 May 2013, Markos Chandras wrote: >> Earlier you said: "Just to clarify, i never said I wanted to >> deprecated the git.overlays.gentoo.org repo." >> Have I missed something? Last time I looked, github's server >> software wasn't open source. Why should we use non-free tools for a >> central piece of Gentoo documentation? > The repository is still accessible in http://git.overlays.gentoo.org > and read-only access is still available. In what way is removing write access different from deprecating the repository? > However, the write access removed because of potential conflicts > between g.o.g.o and github. If you can guarantee me that people will > not mess things up and not commit only to one of the to remotes, > then we can enable write access again. I for my part won't push anything to a devmanual repo hosted at github. As this presumably means that I won't be able to contribute any more, I've now removed myself from the devmanual mail alias. Ulrich