From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A92138A87 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E19BDE0539; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD9D2E04ED for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id r1GGDluc000715 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:13:47 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r1GGDlDK008638; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:13:47 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1GGDlUA008636; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:13:47 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20767.45115.475442.88781@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:13:47 +0100 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time In-Reply-To: <511FA249.10208@gentoo.org> References: <1361020086.1920.51.camel@belkin4> <511F8D2E.1080006@flameeyes.eu> <20130216135918.9383.qmail@stuge.se> <511F935A.4070307@flameeyes.eu> <20767.41209.642994.731090@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <511FA249.10208@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: abd6dc47-d5cd-465e-928d-83bbf046e821 X-Archives-Hash: 9bb8cac8fcc9e80755c4715e3f0dc0bd >>>>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \"Zero Chaos\" Farina wrote: >> Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. > If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not > install those firmware packages. Yes, but ACCEPT_LICENSE wouldn't work. It would still be necessary to include all licenses, even for firmware packages that are not installed. Ulrich