public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files?
@ 2013-02-07 16:07 Ulrich Mueller
  2013-02-07 16:10 ` Markos Chandras
  2013-02-07 16:31 ` Alec Warner
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Mueller @ 2013-02-07 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
our documentation pages and is the name in the SPDX license list [1],

So, while in general I'm against renaming of licenses (e.g., it would
be pointless to rename our GPL-2 to GPL-2.0 in order to conform to the
SPDX list), I think that in this case we should get rid of these long
names which unnecessarily clutter the output of various tools.

The plan would be as follows:

  CC0-1.0-Universal                             ->  CC0-1.0
  CCPL-Attribution-2.0                          ->  CC-BY-2.0
  CCPL-Attribution-2.5                          ->  CC-BY-2.5
  CCPL-Attribution-3.0                          ->  CC-BY-3.0
  CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-2.5                 ->  CC-BY-ND-2.5
  CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-3.0                 ->  CC-BY-ND-3.0
  CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.0   ->  CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0
  CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.5   ->  CC-BY-NC-ND-2.5
  CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.0               ->  CC-BY-SA-2.0
  CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5               ->  CC-BY-SA-2.5
  CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-3.0               ->  CC-BY-SA-3.0
  CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-2.5 ->  CC-BY-NC-SA-2.5
  CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-3.0 ->  CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0
  CCPL-Sampling-Plus-1.0                        ->  CC-Sampling-Plus-1.0
  CCPL-ShareAlike-1.0                           ->  CC-SA-1.0

In total, about 100 packages are affected. so it's a minor effort.

Ulrich

[1] http://www.spdx.org/licenses/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files?
  2013-02-07 16:07 [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files? Ulrich Mueller
@ 2013-02-07 16:10 ` Markos Chandras
  2013-02-07 16:31 ` Alec Warner
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Markos Chandras @ 2013-02-07 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On 7 February 2013 16:07, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
> instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
> our documentation pages and is the name in the SPDX license list [1],
>
> So, while in general I'm against renaming of licenses (e.g., it would
> be pointless to rename our GPL-2 to GPL-2.0 in order to conform to the
> SPDX list), I think that in this case we should get rid of these long
> names which unnecessarily clutter the output of various tools.
>
> The plan would be as follows:
>
>   CC0-1.0-Universal                             ->  CC0-1.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-2.0                          ->  CC-BY-2.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-2.5                          ->  CC-BY-2.5
>   CCPL-Attribution-3.0                          ->  CC-BY-3.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-2.5                 ->  CC-BY-ND-2.5
>   CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-3.0                 ->  CC-BY-ND-3.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.0   ->  CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.5   ->  CC-BY-NC-ND-2.5
>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.0               ->  CC-BY-SA-2.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5               ->  CC-BY-SA-2.5
>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-3.0               ->  CC-BY-SA-3.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-2.5 ->  CC-BY-NC-SA-2.5
>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-3.0 ->  CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0
>   CCPL-Sampling-Plus-1.0                        ->  CC-Sampling-Plus-1.0
>   CCPL-ShareAlike-1.0                           ->  CC-SA-1.0
>
> In total, about 100 packages are affected. so it's a minor effort.
>
> Ulrich
>
> [1] http://www.spdx.org/licenses/
>

Your plan makes sense to me, so +1

-- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files?
  2013-02-07 16:07 [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files? Ulrich Mueller
  2013-02-07 16:10 ` Markos Chandras
@ 2013-02-07 16:31 ` Alec Warner
  2013-02-08 11:48   ` Ben de Groot
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alec Warner @ 2013-02-07 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
> instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
> our documentation pages and is the name in the SPDX license list [1],
>
> So, while in general I'm against renaming of licenses (e.g., it would
> be pointless to rename our GPL-2 to GPL-2.0 in order to conform to the
> SPDX list), I think that in this case we should get rid of these long
> names which unnecessarily clutter the output of various tools.

ask for forgiveness, not permission ;)

-A

>
> The plan would be as follows:
>
>   CC0-1.0-Universal                             ->  CC0-1.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-2.0                          ->  CC-BY-2.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-2.5                          ->  CC-BY-2.5
>   CCPL-Attribution-3.0                          ->  CC-BY-3.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-2.5                 ->  CC-BY-ND-2.5
>   CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-3.0                 ->  CC-BY-ND-3.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.0   ->  CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.5   ->  CC-BY-NC-ND-2.5
>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.0               ->  CC-BY-SA-2.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5               ->  CC-BY-SA-2.5
>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-3.0               ->  CC-BY-SA-3.0
>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-2.5 ->  CC-BY-NC-SA-2.5
>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-3.0 ->  CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0
>   CCPL-Sampling-Plus-1.0                        ->  CC-Sampling-Plus-1.0
>   CCPL-ShareAlike-1.0                           ->  CC-SA-1.0
>
> In total, about 100 packages are affected. so it's a minor effort.
>
> Ulrich
>
> [1] http://www.spdx.org/licenses/
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files?
  2013-02-07 16:31 ` Alec Warner
@ 2013-02-08 11:48   ` Ben de Groot
  2013-02-08 12:56     ` Ulrich Mueller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ben de Groot @ 2013-02-08 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On 8 February 2013 00:31, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
>> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
>> instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
>> our documentation pages and is the name in the SPDX license list [1],
>>
>> So, while in general I'm against renaming of licenses (e.g., it would
>> be pointless to rename our GPL-2 to GPL-2.0 in order to conform to the
>> SPDX list), I think that in this case we should get rid of these long
>> names which unnecessarily clutter the output of various tools.
>
> ask for forgiveness, not permission ;)
>
> -A
>
>>
>> The plan would be as follows:
>>
>>   CC0-1.0-Universal                             ->  CC0-1.0
>>   CCPL-Attribution-2.0                          ->  CC-BY-2.0
>>   CCPL-Attribution-2.5                          ->  CC-BY-2.5
>>   CCPL-Attribution-3.0                          ->  CC-BY-3.0
>>   CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-2.5                 ->  CC-BY-ND-2.5
>>   CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-3.0                 ->  CC-BY-ND-3.0
>>   CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.0   ->  CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0
>>   CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.5   ->  CC-BY-NC-ND-2.5
>>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.0               ->  CC-BY-SA-2.0
>>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5               ->  CC-BY-SA-2.5
>>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-3.0               ->  CC-BY-SA-3.0
>>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-2.5 ->  CC-BY-NC-SA-2.5
>>   CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-3.0 ->  CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0
>>   CCPL-Sampling-Plus-1.0                        ->  CC-Sampling-Plus-1.0
>>   CCPL-ShareAlike-1.0                           ->  CC-SA-1.0
>>
>> In total, about 100 packages are affected. so it's a minor effort.
>>
>> Ulrich
>>
>> [1] http://www.spdx.org/licenses/
>>
>

Yes please!

-- 
Cheers,

Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files?
  2013-02-08 11:48   ` Ben de Groot
@ 2013-02-08 12:56     ` Ulrich Mueller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Mueller @ 2013-02-08 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

>>>>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Ben de Groot wrote:

> On 8 February 2013 00:31, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> So, while in general I'm against renaming of licenses (e.g.,
>>> it would be pointless to rename our GPL-2 to GPL-2.0 in order
>>> to conform to the SPDX list), I think that in this case we should
>>> get rid of these long names which unnecessarily clutter the output
>>> of various tools.
>>
>> ask for forgiveness, not permission ;)

> Yes please!

Done.

@all: Please check if any ebuilds in your overlays must be updated
to the new names.

Ulrich


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-08 12:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-07 16:07 [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files? Ulrich Mueller
2013-02-07 16:10 ` Markos Chandras
2013-02-07 16:31 ` Alec Warner
2013-02-08 11:48   ` Ben de Groot
2013-02-08 12:56     ` Ulrich Mueller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox