From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2231213877A for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 23:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCEC5E0C8A; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 23:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F4181E0C81 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 23:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localnet (unknown [101.228.71.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: patrick) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E149033EECB for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 23:15:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Patrick Lauer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you! Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:15:53 +0800 Message-ID: <2043223.Jk316NgELO@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.13 (Linux/3.16.0-gentoo; KDE/4.14.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5403096A.4060702@gentoo.org> References: <20140830134620.4feb301d@pomiot.lan> <5403096A.4060702@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: b7a0b725-e0c8-41bd-8063-af0109d7ce64 X-Archives-Hash: 6417a08b79b1e1221bf6b9d5f62f027d On Sunday 31 August 2014 11:39:22 hasufell wrote: > Martin Vaeth: > > hasufell wrote: > >> On 08/30/2014 02:35 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > >>> For net-im/skype, > >> > >> Screw skype. > > > > Please don't. Not all communication partners are linux users. > > Tox is multiplatform. > > >> We have tox [1] on the way. > > > > This is far from being ready, especially for non-specialists. > > It is not even foreseeable whether the Android client will ever > > be able to do at least audio. (So far, I was not even able to > > exchange any messages at all. It may be my mistakes, but > > if I am not able to do it, how could I expect this from casual > > computer users?) > > This has nothing to do with specialists. Tox is configuration-free. > > And sure, it's pre-alpha as indicated in my previous mail. So it doesn't work, but you feel the need to feel superior by telling everyone else that they are doing it wrong. Sigh. Can you please troll somewhere else?