From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SRkjS-0006nm-Or for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:45:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07BC4E0763; Tue, 8 May 2012 13:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F0FE0459 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 13:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q48DiARB012438; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:44:10 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q48DiA4K010280; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:44:10 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q48Di9bw010278; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:44:09 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20393.9001.907308.52256@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 15:44:09 +0200 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: bsd@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] amd64-fbsd profile marked 'stable' In-Reply-To: <20120508083339.05de7bd8@gentoo.org> References: <20120508083339.05de7bd8@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: 41de1c88-0434-4acb-b3b1-ad1a02d7a92d X-Archives-Hash: d31c4f614d47f0baaaba58f3f5a78f4b >>>>> On Tue, 8 May 2012, Alexis Ballier wrote: > I've just marked the profile 'default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0' as 'stable' > in profiles.desc. I've been careful not to keyword anything with broken > deps, and its now forbidden. It is the first g/fbsd profile marked as > such. > [...] > cons: there's no stable amd64-fbsd keyword, i suppose that if we want > some day to stabilize it, it'll be hard with a 'stable' profile, but we > can temporarily switch it back to 'dev' while doing it, and without > preventing broken deps it'll be almost impossible to do this anyway. This has as another consequence that we cannot extract the state of keywords from profiles.desc any more. So we need to find a different solution for bug 304133. Any ideas? Ulrich