From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SMvBE-0002HY-RE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:54:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F57DE0802; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC14E0602 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q3P5r9rY001809; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:53:09 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q3P5r9mK032421; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:53:09 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3P5r9mc032417; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:53:09 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20375.37189.178835.86656@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:53:09 +0200 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: azamat.hackimov@gmail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Adding ParaType Free Font License to tree In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 23.4.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: 1b4bf501-221b-4a9c-a2c8-9b95b29b642c X-Archives-Hash: 16bb8d7585266e16d4a7cddaf1305705 >>>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Maxim Koltsov wrote: > We had Paratype fonts in tree for some time (media-fonts/paratype) > with OFL license. Recently they added bold font variant to PTMono font > with their own license [1], but OFL font tarball was left unchanged. > We tried to reach upstream with this question, but as for now no > answer was got. > So the question is: can Paratype FreeFont license be added to tree as > /usr/portage/licenses/paratype? I don't see any reason why it couldn't. It looks like a simplified version of the OFL license, so it could even be included in @MISC-FREE in profiles/license_groups. Ulrich > [1] http://www.paratype.com/public/pt_openlicense_eng.asp