Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?

[Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>]

>>>>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Tiziano Müller wrote:

>> The spec seems to be clear that T is legal in all phases, including
>> pkg_pretend.

> Well, I'd say: there is no sane value you can assign to $T since you
> are not allowed to write anything anyway:

> "pkg_pretend must not write to the filesystem."
> (http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/4/pms.html#x1-9700010.1.2)

That's not necessarily a contradiction. Writing being not allowed
doesn't imply that the directory must not exist.

> and since "pkg_pretend is run separately from the main phase
> function sequence, and does not participate in any kind of
> environment saving" it is not guaranteed to be set to the same $T
> later.

The problem is that apart from T (and maybe HOME), there seems to be
no other directory that check_reqs.eclass could use for its disk space
check in pkg_pretend. WORKDIR doesn't exist in pkg_* phases.

Ulrich