* [gentoo-dev] eselect repository moved to git
@ 2012-03-08 20:37 Ulrich Mueller
2012-03-08 20:48 ` Michał Górny
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Mueller @ 2012-03-08 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
This is a heads up that the eselect repository has moved to
git.overlays.gentoo.org.
If you maintain your modules there, you'll find all external modules
in the "extern" branch, whereas eselect proper is in master.
Note that the version assignment used in most modules will no longer
work with git:
SVN_DATE='$Date$'
VERSION=$(svn_date_to_version "${SVN_DATE}" )
So please make sure that you update the VERSION variable before making
your next release.
Ulrich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect repository moved to git
2012-03-08 20:37 [gentoo-dev] eselect repository moved to git Ulrich Mueller
@ 2012-03-08 20:48 ` Michał Górny
2012-03-08 21:20 ` Ulrich Mueller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michał Górny @ 2012-03-08 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: ulm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 457 bytes --]
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 21:37:21 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> This is a heads up that the eselect repository has moved to
> git.overlays.gentoo.org.
>
> If you maintain your modules there, you'll find all external modules
> in the "extern" branch, whereas eselect proper is in master.
Did you just do the ultimately ugly thing of having two repos in one,
as two completely diverged branches?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect repository moved to git
2012-03-08 20:48 ` Michał Górny
@ 2012-03-08 21:20 ` Ulrich Mueller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Mueller @ 2012-03-08 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Michał Górny; +Cc: gentoo-dev
>>>>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
> Did you just do the ultimately ugly thing of having two repos in one,
> as two completely diverged branches?
I'm certainly not a git expert. But the git project itself does such
things in their repo, so I believe it cannot be completely wrong.
Ulrich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-08 21:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-08 20:37 [gentoo-dev] eselect repository moved to git Ulrich Mueller
2012-03-08 20:48 ` Michał Górny
2012-03-08 21:20 ` Ulrich Mueller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox