From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EAE9158451 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 01:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7CA5E2B26; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 01:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F495E2B22 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 01:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4T7bn02L7YzDqKV for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 01:19:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1704676740; bh=r0YRXoY5WHOh/pzrzjg1KtcVE/zINlK44Baj+uxf9N0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dpinmaAdrIITAQlSVu85UYZaLGX9Wc/xit6HaOevdKD5NjIyLw+fqV9YE15wpkBuX yDcc65lGNgcLNbLj8xiFeYnsQeH2+X1+zWI5vLqnD/0fkeSxOSQv17uCjxkEJ9JhB4 fCCb9wAAfIx1gK8mZhlYUBlUWqSJVqOf+/y8pYPQ= X-Riseup-User-ID: 1893D5348BB73A3634B38ED704DEC6113DD84BB1A996968DE3ADFC12275A65CB Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4T7bn003FtzFpcD for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 01:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 17:18:55 -0800 From: orbea To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category: dev-build Message-ID: <20240107171855.0890e4bb@Akita> In-Reply-To: <3d5f53e891c90681bf090bf0d9a3f5630b0a11b2.camel@gentoo.org> References: <72604ee6acd03fb54bc6f664ce915ecd5b16566a.camel@gentoo.org> <3d5f53e891c90681bf090bf0d9a3f5630b0a11b2.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: c4068a4c-804a-4688-99c5-9087777c2083 X-Archives-Hash: 20dd22a622dddca8ac1698adb6a3de62 On Sun, 07 Jan 2024 17:20:25 +0100 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 09:50 -0500, Yuan Liao (Leo3418) wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:= =20 > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > Another idea for a new category: dev-build. Proposed description: > > >=20 > > > Build systems and related tools. =20 > >=20 > > Have you considered the name 'dev-buildsys'? More straightforward > > in my opinion, with the cost of a longer length. =20 >=20 > I have but I don't like the idea of half-shortcuts. Also, we are > really including some "building" tools like make that aren't really > "systems". >=20 I suggest that ninja, samurai, bmake, pmake and make are all in the same category. Currently the first two are in dev-util while the rest are in sys-devel while they are all build tools that fill a similar need.