From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FEBD158089 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 17:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BF392BC134; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 17:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEC772BC016 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 17:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RpbBl6gwczDqpq for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1694973216; bh=dddJsUN8acCfbXTUcV47fojPB+RYtZk27zQnSL8yZGY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZuH4Fwy8e2PumG2DxdOZoxiZDuRyFGJe6HXhIsqZXyk1ZoDvEIMBLvZaTG4qiavOa lPWs6bekSbHASBf9kGJzKrN150jVW+nhumaEOZ1tiEvlPZx8PCAH9EbY8bE8jr+xwI Y/qfVDO0anB2MaJ8O2RQS+Baq0WKcLJyV9ekO6n0= X-Riseup-User-ID: 379F2BADD367952BA8EA1F1FEEEBFA79BC7FFB6545839C0ED8333E96A3B034D0 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4RpbBl50ctzFpcn for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 10:53:34 -0700 From: orbea To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] last rites (kinda, long masked): sys-apps/opentmpfiles Message-ID: <20230917105334.26c1083d@Akita> In-Reply-To: References: <8459848.MhkbZ0Pkbq@pinacolada> <4843734.GXAFRqVoOG@thetick> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d527ae28-1703-4d3b-9de5-dd180e3311a5 X-Archives-Hash: 1b43715712338cfb34c028e05bbd341d On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 13:25:20 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 2023-09-17 15:32:46, Marc Joliet wrote: > > I just want to say how amazed I am that you (and Arsen, too) still > > have the patience to try and explain the realities of the situation > > like this, especially after the eudev thread. > > I'm a founding member of the systemd haters club so I'm sympathetic, > but in this case there are only a few realistic paths forward and none > of them involve opentmpfiles. > I'll say I agree too, I would like to stop using systemd-tmpfiles, but opentmpfiles is not a viable choice. Given this commit. https://github.com/OpenRC/opentmpfiles/commit/f33d0ea74bb0ab8bdf53e3df499323a828b3b1df And this comment. https://github.com/OpenRC/opentmpfiles/issues/19#issuecomment-877663396 At this point opentmpfiles seems actually dead and unmaintained, it also seems doubtful that will change in the foreseeable future. Its better to look into alternatives instead.