Re: [gentoo-dev] games-emulation/jgemu keywording request

[orbea <orbea@riseup.net>]

On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:38:48 +0100
Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> wrote:

> orbea <orbea@riseup.net> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:18:45 +0100
> > Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >  
> >> orbea <orbea@riseup.net> writes:
> >>   
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Several months ago I made this issue for keywording the
> >> > games-emulation/jgemu meta package which is a collection of
> >> > minimal emulators for the command-line games-emulation/jgrf
> >> > frontend with a focus on accuracy.
> >> >    
> >> 
> >> You've not populated the package list and no arches are CC'd, but
> >> we don't keyword things for no reason either on (very) niche
> >> arches.
> >> 
> >> Please select a reasonable set of architectures.
> >>   
> >> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/891201    
> >> 
> >>   
> >
> > Apologies, I wasn't aware I needed to do that and in retrospect I
> > should of thought of it. Just to be clear you mean add an issue for
> > each issue and then use them as blockers for the
> > games-emulation/jgemu issue?  
> 
> No, one bug is okay if you populate the package list field in
> Bugzilla.
> 
> Just keep in mind that keywording isn't the same as upstreaam CI
> either and we generally want to only keyword on arches where someone
> is likely to use it.
> 

Apologies, I now understand what you meant...

The goal is to hopefully entice real world testers on systems that
jgemu may be used. This is not something a CI would be able to
accomplish.

Do I want independent issues for the dependencies?